INTRODUCTION
⌅The documentation of fossil birds in South America is still very poor and several clades entirely lack a single fossil record (Agnolín, 2016Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172.; Tonni, 1980Tonni, E.P. (1980). The present state of knowledge of the Cenozoic birds of Argentina. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 330, 105-114.; Tambussi and Degrange, 2013). Florentino Ameghino was the first paleontologist that systematically described fossil birds from South America, including Oligocene, Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene birds (Ameghino, 1891Ameghino, F. (1891). Enumeración de las aves fósiles de la República Argentina. Revista Argentina de Historia Natural, 1, 441- 453., 1894Ameghino, F. (1894). Enumération synoptique des espèces de mammifères fossiles des formations éocènes de Patagonie. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba), 13, 259- 452., 1895Ameghino, F. (1895). Sur les oiseaux fossiles de Patagonie. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 15, 501- 602., 1898Ameghino, F. (1898). Sinópsis Geológico-Paleontológica. Segundo Censo de la República Argentina. Cap. I. Territorio, Tercera Parte, 1, 113-255., 1899Ameghino, F. (1899). Sinopsis geologico-paleontologica... En segundo censo nacional de la República Argentina... 1898... Suplemento (adiciones y correcciones), Julio de 1899. Imp. Encuadernacion “La Libertad”, 19 pp.). Particularly, from early Miocene Santa Cruz beds, Ameghino described a large number of taxa belonging to tinamids, rheids, anatids, anhimids, falconids, cathartids, gruiforms, cariamids, basal anseriforms, anhingids, and giant flightless phororhacoid and brontornithid birds (see the following and references therein: Agnolín, 2016Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172.; Degrange, 2022Degrange, F.J. (2022). A new species of Dryornis (Aves, Cathartiformes) from the Santa Cruz Formation (Lower Miocene), Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 41, e2008411.; Degrange et al., 2012Degrange, F.J., Noriega, J.I., and Areta, J.I. (2012). Diversity and paleobiology of the Santacrucian birds. Early Miocene paleobiology in Patagonia: high-latitude paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation, 138-155.; Diederle and Noriega, 2020; Tambussi and Degrange, 2013; Tambussi and Noriega, 1996Tambussi, C.P. and Noriega, J.I. (1996). Summary of the Avian Fossil Record from Southern South America. Müncher Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 30, 245-264; Tonni, 1980Tonni, E.P. (1980). The present state of knowledge of the Cenozoic birds of Argentina. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 330, 105-114.). The Santacrucian birds, without any doubt, represent the most well-known paleornithological assemblage from the early-middle Miocene of the South American continent. However, most of the Cenozoic record of terrestrial birds in South America rests on the finding of very large birds that have hard and thick bones, such as anhingids, phororhacoids, and rheids, whereas other bird lineages which have more fragile bones are frequently known by isolated and incomplete specimens (Agnolín, 2016Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172.).
This paper aims to describe several remains of fossil birds coming from early-middle Miocene beds in Santa Cruz province, Argentina (Table 1; Figure 1).
These birds were collected during joint paleontological expeditions of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales and the State University of New York (Stony Brook) during the decade of the 1980s. The expeditions had the main goal of finding mammalian specimens, particularly primates (Bown and Fleagle, 1993Bown, T.M., and Fleagle, J.G. (1993). Systematics, biostratigraphy, and dental evolution of the Palaeothentidae, later Oligocene to early-middle Miocene (Deseadan-Santacrucian) caenolestoid marsupials of South America. Paleontological Society Memoir, 29, 1-76.; Bown and Larriestra, 1990Bown, T.M., and Larriestra, C.N. (1990). Sedimentary paleoenvironments of fossil platyrrhine localities, Miocene Pinturas Formation, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. In The Platyrrhine Fossil Record (pp. 87-119). Academic Press.; Bown et al., 1988Bown, T.M., Larriestra, C.N., and Powers, D.W. (1988). Analisis paleoambiental de la formación Pinturas (Mioceno inferior), Provincia de Santa Cruz. Actas II Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología, 1, 31-35.). The fossil bird collection described here was preliminarily (and partially) presented in a conference paper by Chiappe (1991)Chiappe, L.M. (1991). Fossil birds from the Miocene Pinturas Formation of southern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(Suppl), R21-22., and later, the distal end of a passeriform humerus and a distal end of a tinamid tibiotarsus were described by Noriega and Chiappe (1993)Noriega, J.I., and Chiappe, L.M. (1993). An early Miocene passeriform from Argentina. The Auk, 936-938. and Bertelli and Chiappe (2005)Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20., respectively.
| Taxon/Stratigraphical unit | Pinturas Formation | Santa Cruz Formation |
|---|---|---|
| Mininothura talenki nov. sp. | X | |
| Peioa australisnov. sp. | X | |
| Chainkanas koshonnov. sp. | X | |
| Kaikenia mourerchauvireanov. sp. | X | |
| Tamtamia yzurietai nov. sp. | X | |
| Phoenicopteriformes indet. | X | |
| Rallidae indet. | X | |
| Patagogrus olsoni nov. sp. | X | |
| Archaeopsophia aoni nov. sp. | X | |
| Alhuenia eduardotonniinov. sp. | X | |
| Caroohierax rapoportinov. sp. | X | |
| Thegornis spivacowi nov. sp. | X | |
| Enskenia galeanoinov. sp. | X | |
| Chehuenia facongrandeinov. sp. | X |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
⌅The material reported here originates from two main fossiliferous sites. The first one is the “Monte Observación locality” at Monte León National Park, northwestern Santa Cruz province, Argentina. Monte Observación is a well-known fossiliferous locality, from which several fossil birds were previously described (Tonni, 1980Tonni, E.P. (1980). The present state of knowledge of the Cenozoic birds of Argentina. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 330, 105-114.; see Vizcaíno et al., 2012Vizcaíno, S.F., Kay, R.F. , and Bargo, M.S. (Eds.). (2012). Early Miocene paleobiology in Patagonia: high-latitude paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 370 pp.). The specimens reported here come from beds of the Santa Cruz Formation (early-middle Miocene; see details in Fleagle et al., 1995Fleagle, J.G., Bown, T.M., Swisher, C., and Buckley, G. (1995). Age of the Pinturas and Santa Cruz formations. Actas Sexto Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía, 6, 129-135.; Tauber 1997aTauber, A.A. (1997a). Bioestratigrafía de la Formación Santa Cruz (Mioceno inferior) en el extremo sudeste de la Patagonia. Ameghiniana, 34(4), 413-426.,bTauber, A.A. (1997b). Paleoecología de la Formación Santa Cruz (Mioceno inferior) en el extremo sudeste de la Patagonia. Ameghiniana, 34(4), 517-529.; 1999Tauber, A.A. (1999). Los vertebrados de la Formación Santa Cruz (Mioceno inferior-medio) en el extremo sureste de la Patagonia y su significado paleoecológico. Revista española de Paleontología, 14(2), 173-182.).
The Loma de la Lluvia and Portezuelo Sumich fossil sites are located very close to the Río Pinturas, in northeastern Santa Cruz province (Bown and Larriestra, 1990Bown, T.M., and Larriestra, C.N. (1990). Sedimentary paleoenvironments of fossil platyrrhine localities, Miocene Pinturas Formation, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. In The Platyrrhine Fossil Record (pp. 87-119). Academic Press.). The fossil bird specimens reported here come from beds of the Pinturas Formation that outcrop on the site, and that are thought to be early-middle Miocene in age (Bown and Larriestra, 1990Bown, T.M., and Larriestra, C.N. (1990). Sedimentary paleoenvironments of fossil platyrrhine localities, Miocene Pinturas Formation, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. In The Platyrrhine Fossil Record (pp. 87-119). Academic Press.; Fleagle et al., 1995Fleagle, J.G., Bown, T.M., Swisher, C., and Buckley, G. (1995). Age of the Pinturas and Santa Cruz formations. Actas Sexto Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía, 6, 129-135.). Despite some authors suggesting that the Pinturas Formation was coeval with the Santa Cruz Formation, radiometric dates suggest that Pinturas is definitively older (Ré et al., 2010Ré, G.H., Bellosi, E.S., Heizler, M., Vilas, J.F., Madden, R.H., Carlini, A.A., ... and Vucetich, M.G. (2010). A geochronology for the Sarmiento Formation at Gran Barranca. In The paleontology of Gran Barranca: evolution and environmental change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia (pp. 46-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.). As indicated by Fleagle et al. (2012)Fleagle, J.G., Perkins, M.E., Heizler, M.T., Nash, B., Bown, T.M., Tauber, A.A., Dozo, M.T., and Tejedor, F. (2012). Absolute and relative ages of fossil localities in the Santa Cruz and Pinturas Formations. Early Miocene Paleobiology in Patagonia: High-Latitude Paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 41-58. the lower and middle beds of Pinturas are certainly older than 16.9 Ma (perhaps 18.5 Ma at its base), whereas several localities further out from Pinturas lack a clear age constraint. The age of the Santa Cruz Formation base is debated, but the top of the unit extends up to 12.1 Ma (Fleagle et al., 2012Fleagle, J.G., Perkins, M.E., Heizler, M.T., Nash, B., Bown, T.M., Tauber, A.A., Dozo, M.T., and Tejedor, F. (2012). Absolute and relative ages of fossil localities in the Santa Cruz and Pinturas Formations. Early Miocene Paleobiology in Patagonia: High-Latitude Paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 41-58.).
The environmental conditions prevailing during the deposition of the Pinturas and Santa Cruz Formations indicate a relatively warm, and humid climate with periodically drier conditions and open areas (see Vizcaíno et al., 2012Vizcaíno, S.F., Kay, R.F. , and Bargo, M.S. (Eds.). (2012). Early Miocene paleobiology in Patagonia: high-latitude paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 370 pp.).
The osteological nomenclature employed by Baumel and Witmer (1993)Baumel, J.J., and Witmer, L.M. (1993). Osteologia. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club Publications, 23, 45-132. is used here, but with terms in Latin translated to the English language. In the case of Anseriformes, the anatomical terminology of the humerus follows that employed by Hiroshige and Yoshikazu (2007)Hiroshige, M., and Yoshikazu, H. (2007). Myology and osteology of the Whooper Swan (Cygnus cygnus) (Aves, Anatidae). Part I. Muscles attached to the sternum, coracoid, clavicle, scapula and humerus. Bulletin of the Gunna Museum of Natural History, 11, 7-14., with modifications by Worthy (2009)Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454. and De Pietri et al. (2016)De Pietri, V.L., Scofield, R.P., Zelenkov, N., Boles, W.E., and Worthy, T.H. (2016). The unexpected survival of an ancient lineage of anseriform birds into the Neogene of Australia: the youngest record of Presbyornithidae. Royal Society Open Science, 3(2), 150635.. The Romerian terminology of “anterior” instead of dorsal or cranial and “posterior” instead of plantar or caudal is employed. In the case of the humerus, the margo dorsalis and margo ventralis (sensu Baumel and Witmer, 1993Baumel, J.J., and Witmer, L.M. (1993). Osteologia. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. Nuttall Ornithological Club Publications, 23, 45-132.) these are regarded here as lateral and medial, respectively.
Institutional abbreviations. BMNH, Ameghino Collection, British Museum of Natural History, London, UK; MACN SC, Santa Cruz Collection, Vertebrate Paleontology Collection, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY
⌅Palaeognathae Pycraft, 1900
⌅Tinamidae Huxley, 1872
Genus Mininothura nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Very small tinamid, smaller than members of the genus Nothura and diagnosable on the basis of the following unique combination of characters: 1- relatively wide and well-defined brachial fossa; 2- anterior articular ligament not raised and subcircular in contour; 3- ectepicondylar process not raised, forming a prominent and thickened lateral edge; and 4- ventral condyle distally extended and subequal in size to dorsal condyle.
Etymology. Mini, meaning small in Latin, Nothura, a tinamid genus.
Type and only known species. Mininothura talenki nov. sp.
Mininothura talenki nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 1429, incomplete distal end of left humerus (Figure 2 A-J).
Paratypes. MACN SC 1612, incomplete distal end of right humerus (Figure 2 K-O); MACN SC 1427, incomplete distal end of left humerus (Figure 2 P-R).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimens come from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Etymology. From the Aonikenk language, talen meaning small.
Description. The distal end of the humerus is notably transversely wide and anteroposteriorly flattened (17 milimeters of maximum transverse width).
The brachial fossa is nearly flat, with its lateral margin delimited by a narrow ridge and medially by a relatively low, rounded, and longitudinally extended shaft ridge. The fossa is relatively wide and ovoidal in contour. The flattened anterior surface of the humerus shows a wide and ovoidal-shaped flat surface proximal to the dorsal condyle, and a wide, flattened, and subcircular-shaped surface separating the ventral condyle from the dorsal condyle and from the facet of the anterior articular ligament.
The entepicondylar process is anteromedially oriented. It is proximally delimited by a small and well-defined pit for the m. pronator superficialis. Distal to this tubercle, the attachment of the anterior articular ligament is represented by a slightly raised and subcircular-shaped surface. The surface for attachment of the m. carpi ulnaris is cup-shaped and relatively deep.
The ectepicondylar process is not prominent. It forms part of a thickened lateral ridge that delimits the distal margin of the humerus. This process is proximally placed with respect to the dorsal condyle.
The main axis of the ventral condyle is subequal to that of the dorsal condyle. A deep and wide intercondylar groove separates both condyles. The distal margin of the dorsal condyle is convex. The ventral condyle is strongly distally extended, it is rounded in shape and shows a laterally extended articular surface. The flexor process is subvertically oriented, it projects distally as far as the ventral condyle does.
In posterior view, the humerotricipital groove is excavated but with faintly defined margins. The olecranon fossa is deep but poorly defined.
Remarks. Mininothura shows a combination of characters present in tinamids, including the distal end of the humerus being transversely wide and anteroposteriorly flat, dorsal and ventral condyles subequal in size, poorly excavated brachial fossa, a wide and ovoidal-shaped flat surface proximal to the dorsal condyle, a wide, flattened, and subcircular-shaped surface separating the ventral condyle from the dorsal condyle and from the facet of the anterior articular ligament (see Bertelli, 2002Bertelli, S. (2002). Filogenia del orden Tinamiformes (Aves: Palaeognathae) [Phylogeny of the order Tinamiformes (Aves: Palaeognathae)] [PhD thesis]. Tucumán: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán., 2017Bertelli, S. (2017). Advances on tinamou phylogeny: an assembled cladistic study of the volant palaeognathous birds. Cladistics, 33(4), 351-374.; Bertelli and Chiappe, 2005Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20.; Bertelli et al., 2014Bertelli, S., Chiappe, L.M., and Mayr, G. (2014). Phylogenetic interrelationships of living and extinct Tinamidae, volant palaeognathous birds from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 172(1), 145-184.).
Extant tinamids are distributed in two main clades: Nothurinae or open-area tinamous, and Tinaminae or forest-dweeling tinamous (Bertelli, 2017Bertelli, S. (2017). Advances on tinamou phylogeny: an assembled cladistic study of the volant palaeognathous birds. Cladistics, 33(4), 351-374.; Bertelli and Chiappe, 2005Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20.; Bertelli et al., 2014Bertelli, S., Chiappe, L.M., and Mayr, G. (2014). Phylogenetic interrelationships of living and extinct Tinamidae, volant palaeognathous birds from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 172(1), 145-184.).
Mininothura shares with tinamines a rounded ectepicondylar process, a character that is synapomorphic of the clade (Bertelli and Chiappe, 2005Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20.). However, Mininothura is unique in the shape of the ectepicondylar process, which is represented by a poorly defined intumescense that is continuous with the lateral margin of the bone. Whether this condition is homologous to that of tinamines is far from certain, and thus, Mininothura is not assigned to any particular tinamid subclade.
The small size of the material may fall within the range of the genera Nothura, Crypturellus, Nothoprocta or Taoniscus, being much smaller than other tinamids (Cenizo et al., 2012Cenizo, M.M., Tambussi, C.P., and Montalvo, C.I. (2012). Late Miocene continental birds from the Cerro Azul Formation in the Pampean region (central-southern Argentina). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 36(1), 47-68.; Chandler, 2012Chandler, R.M. (2012). A new species of tinamou (Aves: Tinamiformes, Tinamidae) from the Early-Middle Miocene of Argentina. PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 9(2), 01-08.). Comparisons with other tinamids reinforces the distinctiveness of Mininothura. In Mininothura the brachial fossa is obliquely oriented with respect to the axis of the bone shaft and is oval in contour, a morphology shared with Tinamus, Eudromia, Tinamotis, Rhynchotus and Nothocercus, and different from the crescent-shape observed in Nothura, Nothoprocta and Peioa (Bertelli et al., 2014Bertelli, S., Chiappe, L.M., and Mayr, G. (2014). Phylogenetic interrelationships of living and extinct Tinamidae, volant palaeognathous birds from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 172(1), 145-184.). The brachial fossa is more excavated than in other small tinamids, such as Nothura and Nothoprocta, resembling Toaniscus in this aspect (Bertelli et al., 2014Bertelli, S., Chiappe, L.M., and Mayr, G. (2014). Phylogenetic interrelationships of living and extinct Tinamidae, volant palaeognathous birds from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 172(1), 145-184.). The flexor process is relatively short, not extended beyond the ventral condyle, and very different from the elongate condition present in Nothocercus, Taoniscus, Nothoprocta and Rhynchotus (Bertelli et al., 2014Bertelli, S., Chiappe, L.M., and Mayr, G. (2014). Phylogenetic interrelationships of living and extinct Tinamidae, volant palaeognathous birds from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 172(1), 145-184.). Mininothura lacks the secondary process close to the supracondylar dorsal process observed in Tinamus and some Crypturellus species (Bertelli, 2002Bertelli, S. (2002). Filogenia del orden Tinamiformes (Aves: Palaeognathae) [Phylogeny of the order Tinamiformes (Aves: Palaeognathae)] [PhD thesis]. Tucumán: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.). The ventral condyle is proximally undercut, whereas in Tinamus, Nothocercus, Crypturellus and Taoniscus it is poorly delimited proximally (Cenizo et al., 2012Cenizo, M.M., Tambussi, C.P., and Montalvo, C.I. (2012). Late Miocene continental birds from the Cerro Azul Formation in the Pampean region (central-southern Argentina). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 36(1), 47-68.). The dorsal condyle is subequal in size to the ventral one, a condition shared with Tinamotis (Bertelli and Chiappe, 2005Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20.). The facet for the anterior articular ligament forms a shallow and well-differentiated subcircular concavity that differs from the less defined and shallower condition observed in Tinamus, Nothocercus and Crypturellus (Cenizo et al., 2012Cenizo, M.M., Tambussi, C.P., and Montalvo, C.I. (2012). Late Miocene continental birds from the Cerro Azul Formation in the Pampean region (central-southern Argentina). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 36(1), 47-68.).
Bertelli and Chiappe (2005)Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20. reported the distal end of tinamid humeri as coming from early-middle Miocene beds of the Santa Cruz Formation, in Santa Cruz province. The two specimens described by Bertelli and Chiappe (2005)Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20. belong to two closely related, but different species. These specimens can be clearly distinguished from Mininothura by having ventral condyle notably larger than the dorsal one, by the much smaller and shallow brachial fossa, and by a prominent ectepicondylar process. On this basis, it can be affirmed that at least three different small-sized and one large tinamid were present in Santa Cruz province during early-middle Miocene times.
Anseriformes Wagler, 1831
⌅Genus Peioa nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Medium-sized anseriform, having the following unique combination of characters: 1- brachial fossa crescent-shaped, well-defined, and notably narrow; 2- brachial fossa obliquely oriented, with its distal third subvertically oriented, very close and subparallel to the medial edge of the shaft; 3- surface for the anterior articular ligament anteriorly protrudent and distally facing; 4- ectepicondylar process prominent, but located distal to the proximal level of the dorsal condyle; and 5- humerotricipital groove well-defined and delimited by relatively sharp ridges.
Etymology. Peio, from the Aonikenk language, meaning hen.
Type and only known species. Peioa australis nov. sp.
Peioa australis nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 1452, distal half of right humerus (Figure 3).
Locality and horizon. The specimen comes from the Santa Cruz Formation (Early-Middle Miocene), at the well-known fossiliferous locality of Monte Observación (the label indicates “Estaca 29”), Monte León National Park, Santa Cruz province, Argentina.
Etymology. Australis, from the Latin language, meaning southern.
Description. The distal end of the humerus is notably transversely wide and anteroposteriorly flattened (13 milimeters of maximum transverse width).
The fossa for the musculus brachialis is relatively shallow, but well-defined. The fossa is crescent-shaped in contour and obliquely oriented, with its distal third oriented subparallel to the medial margin of the bone shaft. The anterior surface of the humerus shows a wide and ovoidal-shaped flat surface proximal to the dorsal condyle, and a wide, flattened, and subcircular-shaped surface separating ventral condyle from dorsal condyle and from the facet of the anterior articular ligament.
The entepicondylar process is medially oriented and proximally delimited by a relatively shallow m. pronator superficialis. Distally, it shows a well defined and deep fossa for the m. carpi ulnaris. Anterodistal to this tubercle, the attachment of the anterior articular ligament is represented by a well-raised, subcircular-shaped, and distally oriented surface.
The ectepicondylar process is not prominent and is rounded. It is distally located, close to the mid-height of the dorsal condyle.
The main axis of the ventral condyle is shorter than that of the dorsal one. A deep and wide intercondylar groove separates both condyles. The distal margin of the dorsal condyle is convex. The flexor process is subvertically oriented, it projects distally as far as the ventral condyle.
In the posterior view, the humerotricipital groove is well-defined, excavated and delimited by subvertically oriented ridges. It is notably proximally extended. The olecranon fossa is deep and well-defined. The scapulotricipital groove is wide, relatively deep and well-defined, delimited by narrow longitudinal ridges.
Remarks. Peioa australis nov. sp. shows a combination of characters that indicate anseriform affinities: a low ectepicondylar process, a flattened entepicondyle with subparallel, well-defined, and oval pits for the m. carpi ulnaris and m. pronator superficial, and an ectepicondylar process with subparallel, well-defined, and oval pits for the m. carpi radialis and lig. collateral fossa (Worthy et al., 2022Worthy, T. H., Scofield, R. P., Hand, S. J., De Pietri, V. L., and Archer, M. (2022). A swan-sized fossil anatid (Aves: Anatidae) from the early Miocene St Bathans Fauna of New Zealand. Zootaxa, 5168(1), 39-50.). In spite of being clearly anseriform, the morphology of Peioa is very different from most ducks and geese.
The distal end of the humerus in Peioa nov. gen. is remarkable in being transversely expanded, anteroposteriorly compressed, with a very small and poorly excavated musculus brachialis antiquus impression, and the shaft poorly differentiated from the distal end of the bone (Woolfenden 1961Woolfenden, G.E. (1961). Postcranial osteology of the waterfowl. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences, 6(1), 1-129., Olson 1999; Cenizo and Agnolín, 2010Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514.), similar to the condition observed in the basal anseriforms Conflicto, Anseranas and Anatalavis (Olson 1999; Tambussi et al., 2019Tambussi, C.P., Degrange, F.J., De Mendoza, R.S., Sferco, E., and Santillana, S. (2019). A stem anseriform from the early Palaeocene of Antarctica provides new key evidence in the early evolution of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 186 (3), 673-700.; Worthy et al., 2022Worthy, T. H., Scofield, R. P., Hand, S. J., De Pietri, V. L., and Archer, M. (2022). A swan-sized fossil anatid (Aves: Anatidae) from the early Miocene St Bathans Fauna of New Zealand. Zootaxa, 5168(1), 39-50.). However, Peioa clearly differs from the later taxa in some anatomical details. In Peioa the surface for the anterior articular ligament is anteriorly protrudent and distally facing, it is transversely wide and proximodistally low. In contrast, in Conflicto, Anatalavis and Anseranas, this surface is not prominent and ovoidal in contour, being more proximodistally tall than transversely wide. The flexor process in Peioa is much more distally extended than in Anatalavis and Anseranas, and the brachial fossa is smaller. In Peioa the ectepicondylar process is prominent, but is located distal to the proximal level of the dorsal condyle, whereas in Anatalavis and Anseranas it is located more proximally (Olson, 1999). In contrast to Anseranas and reminiscent to Anatalavis, in Peioa the olecranal and humerotricipital fossae are deep and well-defined (Olson, 1999). The shape of the brachial fossa in Peioa clearly differs from that of Anatalavis and Anseranas.
Eutelornis patagonicus was described by Ameghino (1894)Ameghino, F. (1894). Enumération synoptique des espèces de mammifères fossiles des formations éocènes de Patagonie. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba), 13, 259- 452. based on associated distal radius, distal humerus and partial tibiotarsus from the Santa Cruz Formation, in Santa Cruz province, Argentina. Ameghino regarded Eutelornis as an anseriform of uncertain affinities. Later, because of its plesiomorphic-looking aspect, Cenizo and Agnolín (2010)Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514. indicated that it was a very basal anseriform of uncertain affinities, probably related to Anseranatidae.
Eutelornis is somewhat reminiscent to Peioa in having the distal end notably flattened, the brachial fossa not strongly excavated and crescent-shaped, and its distal end subvertically oriented and subparallel to the medial margin of the humeral shaft. Furthermore, it shows a very large ventral condyle, a condition similar to that of palaeognathous tinamids (Bertelli and Chiappe, 2005Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20.). Peioa differs from Eutelornis in having a smaller ventral condyle, in having a rounded and not prominent supracondylar process that is more distally positioned, and in having well-defined humerotricipital groove and ridges.
Based on the presence of a large number of common morphological attributes, it is probable that Peioa and Eutelornis may form a clade of basal anseriforms.
Anhimidae Stejneger, 1885
⌅Genus Chainkanas nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Large anseriform diagnosed on the basis of the following combination of characters: 1- procoracoid extensive and dorsally hooked (shorter and not dorsally tilted in Chauna, Anhima and Chaunoides); 2- humeral facet strongly medially tilted (not tilted in Chauna, Anhima and Chaunoides); 3- humeral facet nearly reaching the level of the distal end of the scapular facet (more proximally placed in Chauna, Anhima and Chaunoides); 4- scapular facet subcircular in contour and deeply excavated, and slightly distally oriented (strongly laterally oriented in Chauna, Chaunoides and Anhima); and 5- acrocoracoid process elongated (shared with Chaunoides; much wider and stouter in Chauna and Anhima).
Etymology. Chaink, meaning large in Aonikenk language; anas, meaning duck in Latin.
Type and only known species. Chainkanas koshon nov. sp.
Chainkanas koshon nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 3306, right coracoid with incomplete distal end (Figure 4).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Etymology. Koshon, from the Aonikenk language meaning scream; members of the family Anhimidae are popularly known as “screamers” in English language.
Description. Relatively elongate coracoid, especially the acrocoracoid process (68 millimeters of maximum preserved length). Poorly excavated triosseal concavity, with well-defined margins. Ventral fossa deep and well-defined. The scapular facet is deeply excavated, subcircular in contour, and with well-raised margins. It is distolaterally oriented, and is connected with the acrocoracoid by menas of a thick and rounded ridge. The humeral facet is roughly ovoidal in contour. It distally extends for almost three quarters the proximodistal height of the scapular facet. It is strongly medially tilted and, consequently, its lateral exposure is relatively narrow. Its margins are delimited by a very narrow, but well-raised minute ridge. Procoracoid process prominent and thick, strongly proximally curved and hook-like. The base of this process shows an ellipsoidal-shaped and relatively wide procoracoid foramen.
The coracoid body is transversely wide and shows a nearly flat lateral surface that is only interrupted by obliquely oriented muscle scars. The distal end preserves the margin that delimited a very large distal pneumatic foramen.
Remarks. Chainkanas nov. gen. can be included among anhimids by having very large size, robust coracoid with a large procoracoid process, procoracoid foramen extensive and ellipsoidal in contour, and the presence of a large pneumatic foramen at its distal end (Alvarenga, 1999Alvarenga, H.M. (1999). A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: Anhimidae) from the Middle Tertiary of Southeastern Brazil. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 223-230.). As indicated in the diagnosis, Chainkanas can be clearly distinguished by other extant and extinct anhimids, especially by its procoracoid shape. Among anhimids, it is more similar to the Oligocene genus Chaunoides from Brazil than to extant genera Anhima and Chauna, by having a relatively elongate coracoid, narrow acrocoracoid process, and very wide and deep scapular fossa (Alvarenga, 1999Alvarenga, H.M. (1999). A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: Anhimidae) from the Middle Tertiary of Southeastern Brazil. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 223-230.).
Loxornis clivus is a bird species based on a distal tibiotarsus with eroded distal condyles coming from the Deseadan beds (Oligocene) of Santa Cruz province. The only known specimen. It was originally described by Ameghino (1895)Ameghino, F. (1895). Sur les oiseaux fossiles de Patagonie. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 15, 501- 602. as an uncertain anseriform (Tonni, 1980Tonni, E.P. (1980). The present state of knowledge of the Cenozoic birds of Argentina. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 330, 105-114.), and more recently it was regarded as a possible anhimid by Alvarenga (1999Alvarenga, H.M. (1999). A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: Anhimidae) from the Middle Tertiary of Southeastern Brazil. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 223-230.; see Cenizo and Agnolín, 2010Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514.). Because Loxornis and Chainkanas are based on different materials, a direct comparison between them is not possible. However, it should be pointed out, that both come from distant stratigraphical units that show strong faunal differences. Furthermore, as pointed out by Alvarenga (1999)Alvarenga, H.M. (1999). A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: Anhimidae) from the Middle Tertiary of Southeastern Brazil. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 223-230. the phylogenetic position of Loxornis is not clear, and it is not entirely certain that it belongs to Anhimidae.
Anatidae Leach, 1820
⌅Tadorninae Reichenbach, 1850
Genus Kaikenia nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Relatively large anatid, very similar in size and shape to Miotadorna, having the following unique combination of characters: 1- lateral margin of the shaft nearly straight; 2- attachment of the pronator muscle distally located with respect to the proximal margin of the anterior articular ligamental facet (at the same level in remaining tadornines; Worthy et al., 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.); 3- scapulotricipital groove deep, but does not extend around the distal end of the bone (in contrast to remaining tadornines; Worthy et al., 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.); 4- flexor process poorly extended distally; and 5- olecranal fossa in distal view, laterally delimited by a thick ridge.
Etymology. Kaiken, meaning members of the goose genus Chloephaga in Aonikenk language.
Type and only included species. Kaikenia mourerchauvirea nov. sp.
Kaikenia mourerchauvirea nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 4506, right humerus lacking its proximal third (Figure 5).
Locality and horizon. The specimen comes from the Santa Cruz Formation (Early-Middle Miocene), at the well-known fossiliferous locality of Monte Observación (the label of the specimen indicates “Estaca 7”), Monte León National Park, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. Collected in 1991.
Referred material. MACN SC 3431, proximal end of left carpometacarpus (Figure 6).
Locality and horizon. The referred specimen comes from the Santa Cruz Formation (Early-Middle Miocene), Monte Observación locality, Monte León National Park, Santa Cruz province, Argentina.
Etymology. The specific epithet honors Cécile Mourer-Chauviré, a leading paleontologist from France, who greatly contributed to our current knowledge on palaeornithology.
Description. Kaikenia nov. gen. is a relatively large anatid, the size of Chloephaga, but having more gracile proportions (20 millimeters of maximum distal width). The preserved shaft indicates that the humerus was narrow and with nearly straight lateral and medial margins, lacking the remarkable sigmoid curvature present in some genera such as Anabernicula and Tadorna (Howard, 1964Howard, H. (1964). A new species of the “pygmy goose” Anabernicula, from the Oregon Pleistocene, with a discussion of the genus. American Museum Novitates, 2200, 1-14.).
The anterior surface of the shaft is nearly flat, with an ellipsoidal-shaped but shallow and poorly defined brachial fossa. This fossa is proximally placed, and its distal end does not reach the level of the proximal end of the ectepicondylar prominence. This latter prominence is well-defined but proximodistally low and shows a well defined concavity for attachment of the dorsal collateral ligament. The facet of the attachment for the anterior articular ligament is very wide and not well-raised from the surface surrounding it. The surface for the attachment of the m. carpi ulnaris is very deep, prominent, and distally located. The flexor process is poorly distally extended and is level with the distal margin of the dorsal condyle.
Dorsal and ventral condyles are prominent and well-defined, the latter being smaller than the former, and ovoidal in contour.
In posterior view the olecranal fossa is shallow and is not dorsally delimited by a subhorizontally oriented ridge. The scapulotricipital groove is well defined but shallow and does not extend around the distal end of the bone.
In distal view the olecranal fossa is delimited along its lateral margin by a thick ridge. This ridge is continuous with the distal edge of the dorsal condyle extending posteriorly and ending in a subtriangular bump.
The proximal end of the carpometacarpus is referred to Kaikenia because of its size and corresponding characteristics. It shows a shallow infratrochlear fossa and relatively deep anterior and cuneiform fossae. The posterior fossa is notably deep and forms a strong notch at the base of the carpal trochlea. The proximal synostosis is proximodistally short. The minor metacarpal is medially grooved.
Remarks. Kaikenia nov. gen. may be referred to Tadorninae on the basis of the following combination of characteristics: tendence to narrowing of the humeral shaft, distinct ectepicondylar prominence and scapulotricipital groove, distal margin of flexor process level with distal margin of dorsal condyle, and shallow brachial fossa (Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.; Worthy et al., 2007Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J., Jones, C., McNamara, J.A., and Douglas, B.J. (2007). Miocene waterfowl and other birds from Central Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5(1), 1-39.).
Its large size easily distinguishes Kaikenia from several small tadornines, such as Nannonetta, Pleistoanser and Anabernicula. The North America Pleistocene genus Brantadorna lacks overlaping material with Kaikenia, and thus, comparisons are not possible (Howard, 1963Howard, H. (1963). Fossil birds from the Anza-Borrego desert. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of los Angeles County, 73, 3-33).
Kaikenia differs from members of the genera Chloephaga, Neochen, Anabernicula, Australotadorna, Pleistoanser and Alopochen in having a straight shafted and narrow humerus, with poorly developed flexor tubercle, and much less prominent ectepicondylar prominence (see Agnolín, 2006aAgnolín, F.L. (2006a). Dos nuevos Anatidae (Aves, Anseriformes) del Pleistoceno inferior-medio de Argentina. Studia Geologica Salmanticensia, 42, 81-95.; Howard, 1964Howard, H. (1964). A new species of the “pygmy goose” Anabernicula, from the Oregon Pleistocene, with a discussion of the genus. American Museum Novitates, 2200, 1-14.; Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.). In these features, Kaikenia resembles tadorninines of the genera Tadorna and Miotadorna. However, it differs from both by having a prominent entepicondylar process and the attachment for the m. carpi ulnaris very deep and medially oriented (Worthy et al., 2007Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J., Jones, C., McNamara, J.A., and Douglas, B.J. (2007). Miocene waterfowl and other birds from Central Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5(1), 1-39.). Particularly, Kaikenia is similar in shape and development of the ectepicondylar process, flexor process, and facet for the anterior articular attachment to the extinct Miocene genus Miotadorna (Worthy and Lee, 2008Worthy, T.H., and Lee, M.S. (2008). Affinities of Miocene waterfowl (Anatidae: Manuherikia, Dunstanetta and Miotadorna) from the St Bathans Fauna, New Zealand. Palaeontology, 51(3), 677-708.; Worthy et al., 2007Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J., Jones, C., McNamara, J.A., and Douglas, B.J. (2007). Miocene waterfowl and other birds from Central Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5(1), 1-39.). However, it differs in several important anatomical features (as indicated above), including a shallower brachial fossa (distally very deep in Miotadorna, Alopochen and Australotadorna; Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.) and having a poorly distally oriented flexor process (Worthy et al., 2007Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J., Jones, C., McNamara, J.A., and Douglas, B.J. (2007). Miocene waterfowl and other birds from Central Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5(1), 1-39.). A feature that occurs in Kaikenia, that is unknown in other tardornines, is the presence in distal view of a ridge that delimits the olecranal fossa. This feature may be regarded as autapomorphic of Kaikenia.
Teleornis impressus is an anatid named by Ameghino 1899Ameghino, F. (1899). Sinopsis geologico-paleontologica... En segundo censo nacional de la República Argentina... 1898... Suplemento (adiciones y correcciones), Julio de 1899. Imp. Encuadernacion “La Libertad”, 19 pp. on the basis of an incomplete forelimb coming from Deseadan Oligocene beds at Santa Cruz province. Teleornis was later considered as belonging to Tadorninae (Agnolín, 2004Agnolín, F.L. (2004). Revisión sistemática de algunas aves deseadenses (Oligoceno Medio) descriptas por Ameghino en 1899. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Nueva Serie, 6(2), 239-244.). Kaikenia differs from Teleornis in being much larger and in having the distal end of the bone transversely wider and more anteroposteriorly flattened. Furthermore, Kaikenia differs in having a much thicker and less distally extended flexor process, and by the shallower humerotricipital groove.
Genus Tamtamia nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Mid-sized and relatively gracile tadornine diagnosable on the basis of the following combination of characteristics: distal end of humerus: 1- very low ectepicondylar prominence that is distally located level with the dorsal margin of the dorsal condyle; 2- very prominent and large attachment for the anterior articular ligament, which is very prominent and medially displaced; 3- attachment for the anterior articular ligament ventrally delimited by a strongly concave fossa for the m. carpi ulnaris; 4- small flexor process that is not distally extended and is located close to the dorsal margin of the ventral condyle; proximal end of humerus: 5- transversely expanded and anteroposteriorly flattened; 6- shallow pneumotricipital fossa; 7- ventral pneumotricipital fossa pneumatic, and delimited by lateral and well-raised ridge (dorsal crus commune); 8- bicipital crest extensive and strongly flared; and 9- capital ridge located between the humeral head and the dorsal tubercle.
Etymology. Támtam, meaning female members of the goose genus Chloephaga in Aonikenk language.
Type and only included species. Tamtamia yzurietai nov. sp.
Tamtamia yzurietai nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 4507, distal end of right humerus and proximal end of left humerus from the same individual (Figure 7 A-E, I-M).
Paratypes. MACN SC, 4508, distal end of left humerus (Figure 7 N-R); MACN SC 3309, proximal end of right humerus (Figure 7 F-H).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Etymology. Yzurietai, honouring the naturalist, birdwatcher and artist Dario Yzurieta (1931-1996). Together with “Tito” Narosky they published the most useful Bird Guide Identification of the Neotropics. Due to their conjoined efforts, hundreds of young people become birdwatchers (including the author of the present contribution).
Description. Tamtamia nov. gen. is a relatively gracile tadornine (maximum transverse width of proximal end 14 milimeters; maximum transverse width of distal end 12 milimeters). The preserved shaft of humerus indicates that it was narrow and with nearly straight lateral and medial margins, lacking the strong sigmoid curvature present in some genera such as Anabernicula, Australotadorna and Tadorna (Howard, 1964Howard, H. (1964). A new species of the “pygmy goose” Anabernicula, from the Oregon Pleistocene, with a discussion of the genus. American Museum Novitates, 2200, 1-14.; Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.).
The ventral pneumotricipital fossa is relatively wide and deep. Despite being partially covered by matrix, it is clear that it was pneumatized. It is strongly medially extended along a flat surface formed by the bicipital crest. It is laterally delimited by the dorsal crus commune which extends distally as a ridge. The ventral tubercle is subtriangular in contour and relatively low. It is laterally delimited by a very wide and deeply excavated capital groove. The dorsal pneumotricipital fossa is wide and deep. The humeral head is relatively low and not very prominent; it is well-separated from the dorsal tubercle by a concavity. The capital ridge is prominent and is located between the humeral head and the dorsal tubercle. The dorsal tubercle is very wide, proximally extended and notably prominent. The deltopectoral crest is incomplete, but its surface is notably concave in posterior view.
In anterior view, the transverse ligamental groove is represented by a shallow and poorly defined excavation that distally delimits the humeral head.
The anterior surface of the shaft shows a well-defined and ellipsoidal shaped brachial fossa which deepens towards its disto-medial margin. This fossa is proximally placed, and its distal end does not reach the level of the proximal end of the ectepicondylar prominence. This prominence is well-defined, distally located (at the same level as the dorsal margin of the dorsal condyle) and is mound-shaped in anterior view. It shows a well-defined concavity for the attachment of the m. pronator superficialis. The facet for the attachment of the anterior articular ligament is very wide and very well-raised from the surface surrounding it. It is anterodistally oriented. It is strongly medially located and is far from the medial margin of the ventral condyle. It is ventrally delimited by a very deep and wide m. carpi ulnaris fossa. The flexor process is poorly developed and slightly extended distally, being close to the proximal margin of the ventral condyle.
Dorsal and ventral condyles are prominent and well-defined. The latter is much smaller than the former, ovoidal in contour, and is subhorizontally oriented.
In posterior view the olecranal fossa is well-excavated and dorsally delimited by a subhorizontally oriented ridge. The scapulotricipital and humerotricipital grooves are relatively wide and shallow.
Remarks. The distal end of the humerus of Tamtamia nov. gen. is very different from basal forms such as anseranatids, anhimids, dendrocygnines and romainvilliines by being anteroposteriorly thicker and transversely narrow, and by the poorly excavated distal end of the bone proximal to the ventral and dorsal condyles (Agnolín and Tomassini, 2012Agnolín, F.L., and Tomassini, R.L. (2012). A fossil Dendrocygninae (Aves, Anatidae) from the early Pliocene of the Argentine Pampas and its paleobiogeographical implications. Annales de Paléontologie, 98, 191-201.; Mayr, 2008Mayr, G. (2008). Phylogenetic affinities and morphology of the late Eocene anseriform bird Romainvillia stehlini Lebedinsky, 1927. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen, 248, 365-380.).
Tamtamia is assigned to Tadorninae on the basis of the following combination of characteristics: prominent capital shaft ridge located close to the level of the dorsal tubercle, elevated and elongate dorsal tubercle, dorsal pneumotricipital fossa narrow and not strongly excavated under the humeral head, large ventral pneumotricipital fossa, deltoid crest concave in posterior view, and strongly raised and distally oriented facet for the anterior articular ligament (Woolfenden, 1961Woolfenden, G.E. (1961). Postcranial osteology of the waterfowl. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences, 6(1), 1-129.; Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.).
Tamtamia differs from Chloephaga in that it lacks the very weak capital ridge and the shaft compression adjacent to the angle of the deltoid crest, but well rounded from there, a condition unique to this genus (Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.). It also differs in the more proximodistally narrow and less prominent humeral head. It differs from Pleistocene Anabernicula, Pleistoanser and Nannonetta in the poorly distally extended flexor process and in the distally positioned ectepicondylar prominence, among several other anatomical details (Agnolín, 2006aAgnolín, F.L. (2006a). Dos nuevos Anatidae (Aves, Anseriformes) del Pleistoceno inferior-medio de Argentina. Studia Geologica Salmanticensia, 42, 81-95.; Howard, 1964Howard, H. (1964). A new species of the “pygmy goose” Anabernicula, from the Oregon Pleistocene, with a discussion of the genus. American Museum Novitates, 2200, 1-14.). From Neochen, Alopochen and Brantadorna it differs in the much more gracile proportions, narrower shaft, and smaller and less prominent humeral head (see Howard, 1963Howard, H. (1963). Fossil birds from the Anza-Borrego desert. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of los Angeles County, 73, 3-33; Short, 1970Short, L.L. (1970). Mid-Pleistocene birds from western Nebraska, including a new species of sheldgoose. The Condor, 72(2), 147-152.). It differs from Australotadorna in having a more gracile construction, with a less prominent humeral head, ventral pneumotricipital fossa delimited by a ridge, and rounded and relatively low ventral tubercle, among several other anatomical traits (see Worthy, 2009Worthy, T.H. (2009). Descriptions and phylogenetic relationships of two new genera and four new species of Oligo-Miocene waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) from Australia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(2), 411-454.).
In size and proportions, Tamtamia is reminiscent to the extant genus Tadorna and extinct Miocene genus Miotadorna (see Worthy and Lee, 2008Worthy, T.H., and Lee, M.S. (2008). Affinities of Miocene waterfowl (Anatidae: Manuherikia, Dunstanetta and Miotadorna) from the St Bathans Fauna, New Zealand. Palaeontology, 51(3), 677-708.; Worthy et al., 2007Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J., Jones, C., McNamara, J.A., and Douglas, B.J. (2007). Miocene waterfowl and other birds from Central Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5(1), 1-39.). It differs from Tadorna in having a much wider and excavated ventral pneumotricipital fossa that is laterally delimited by a subvertical ridge, by having a more prominent but distally located ectepicondylar prominence, and a proximally positioned flexor process. It differs from Miotadorna in having a notably wider and more excavated ventral pneumotricipital fossa, and a prominent and distally located ectepicondylar prominence (Worthy and Lee, 2008Worthy, T.H., and Lee, M.S. (2008). Affinities of Miocene waterfowl (Anatidae: Manuherikia, Dunstanetta and Miotadorna) from the St Bathans Fauna, New Zealand. Palaeontology, 51(3), 677-708.; Worthy et al., 2007Worthy, T.H., Tennyson, A.J., Jones, C., McNamara, J.A., and Douglas, B.J. (2007). Miocene waterfowl and other birds from Central Otago, New Zealand. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5(1), 1-39.).
Tamtamia differs from Kaikenia (described above) in several features, including a deeper and more extensive humerotricipital groove, a well-raised facet for the anterior articular ligament, a deep brachial fossa, and different development of the ectepicondylar process and flexor process. Tamtamia differs from Teleornis (Ameghino, 1899Ameghino, F. (1899). Sinopsis geologico-paleontologica... En segundo censo nacional de la República Argentina... 1898... Suplemento (adiciones y correcciones), Julio de 1899. Imp. Encuadernacion “La Libertad”, 19 pp.; Agnolín, 2004Agnolín, F.L. (2004). Revisión sistemática de algunas aves deseadenses (Oligoceno Medio) descriptas por Ameghino en 1899. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Nueva Serie, 6(2), 239-244.) in that the latter has a prominent and distally extended flexor process, whereas in Tamtamia it is much shorter and more proximally positioned with respect to the distal end of the ventral condyle. The ventral condyle in Tamtamia is subhorizontally oriented, whereas in Teleornis it is strongly oblique, forming an angle of about 90° with the main axis of the dorsal condyle (see Agnolín, 2004Agnolín, F.L. (2004). Revisión sistemática de algunas aves deseadenses (Oligoceno Medio) descriptas por Ameghino en 1899. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Nueva Serie, 6(2), 239-244.).
Tamtamia comes from beds that are probably coeval with those that yielded the basal anatid Ankonetta larriestrai (Cenizo and Agnolín, 2010Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514.). Regrettably, Ankonetta is based on an incomplete tarsometatarsus, and thus, there is no overlapping material with Tamtamia. As described by Cenizo and Agnolín (2010)Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514., Ankonetta is a basal dendrocygnine-like anatid, and in all probability larger in size than that inferred for Tamtamia. It is not improbable that after the finding of new materials, Tamtamia may result in being a junior synonym for Ankonetta.
Phoenicopteriformes Sharpe, 1891
⌅Indeterminate genus and species
Referred material. MACN SC 1401, distal end of left humerus (Figure 8A-E); MACN SC 4509, distal end of right tarsometatarsus lacking II metatarsal trochlea (Figure 8 F-N).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Description. The distal end of the humerus is anteroposteriorly flattened and transversely wide. The distal condyles are not very prominent, the ventral one being subequal in size to the dorsal one.
There is no prominent ectepicondylar process, and the surface for the attachment of the m. carpi radialis and the collateral ligament is nearly continuous. The ectepicondylar prominence is notably thick and forms a continuous and convex ridge that is more proximally extended than the facet of the anterior articular ligament.
In posterior view, the olecranal fossa is well defined and subhorizontally oriented. The humerotricipital and scapulotricipital grooves are not evident. The flexor process is prominent, bump-like, and distally extended.
The distal end of the tarsometatarsus is strongly eroded and poorly preserved. The bone is remarkable because of its strong transverse compression. The shaft is transversely compressed but anteroposteriorly long. The distal vascular foramen is not preserved, but it was proximally placed. The groove separating distal trochleae IV and III is well-defined, narrow and deep. The base of trochlea II has been preserved, and it is much more proximally located than trochlea IV. Trochlea IV is strongly posteriorly oriented and shows a very wide and posteriorly extended posterolateral wing. The base of trochlea IV indicates that it was laterally tilted.
Remarks. The specimens described here can be referred to Phoenicopteriformes on the basis of the following combination of characteristics: high and flattened ventral supracondylar tubercle, flexor process not posteriorly extended, well-defined olecranal fossa, tarsometatarsus strongly transversely compressed, trochlea IV with very wide and expanded posterior wing, and proximally positioned vascular foramen (Ericson, 1999Ericson, P.G. (1999). New material of Juncitarsus (Phoenicopteriformes), with a guide for differentiating that genus from the Presbyornithidae (Anseriformes). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 245-251.; Feduccia, 1976Feduccia, A. (1976). Osteological evidence for shorebird affinities of the flamingos. The Auk, 93(3), 587-601.; Zelenkov, 2021Zelenkov, N.V. (2021). A Revision of the Palaeocene-Eocene Mongolian Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Paleontological Journal, 55(3), 323-330.).
Among phoenicopteriforms, MACN SC 1401 and MACN SC 4509 are reminiscent to stem-phoenicopteriforms, such as Juncitarsus, in being relatively small in size, having strong distal compression of the tarsometatarsus, and in having a small and obliquely oriented ectepicondylar process on the humerus (Ericson, 1999Ericson, P.G. (1999). New material of Juncitarsus (Phoenicopteriformes), with a guide for differentiating that genus from the Presbyornithidae (Anseriformes). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 245-251.). These features distinguish them from modern phonicopteriforms, such as Phoenicopterus, Phoeniconaias and Palaelodus (Vickers Rich et al., 1987Vickers Rich, P., van Tets, G.F., Rich, T.H.V., and McEvey, A.R. (1987). The Pliocene and Quaternary flamingoes of Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 25, 207-225.). In this way, we regard these specimens as probably being related to stem-phoenicopteriforms like Juncitarsus.
Gruiformes (Bonaparte, 1854)
⌅Rallidae Vigors, 1825
Indeterminate genus and species
Referred material. MACN SC 1431, incomplete distal end of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 9 I-O); MACN SC 1433, proximal end of left tarsometatarsus (Figure 9 A-H).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Description. The specimens reported here match the size, shape and characteristics of the extant genus Rallus. It is possible that both belong to the same taxon.
The proximal end of the bone is poorly preserved. The proximal intercotylar eminence is relatively low, anteriorly projected and prominent. The medial cotyle is more excavated and more proximally placed than the lateral one. It shows an acute and very well-raised medial margin. The hypotarsus shows a well-developed lateral crest and a reduced medial one. The hypotarsus ends in a well-defined distal notch.
The distal end of the tarsometatarsus is gracile and shows subparallel lateral and medial margins of the shaft. It shows a subrectangular cross-section.
Distal trochleae are disposed nearly on the same plane when viewed distally. The articular surfaces of the trochleae are wide and proximally extended. In anterior view the III metatarsal trochlea is more distally extended than trochlea II and shows a well excavated surface. It is highly asymmetrical, with the external rim much more prominent and proximally extended than the inner rim. Its proximal margin is subtriangular in contour.
Trochlea IV is subrectangular in contour and is poorly excavated. It is separated by a wide and proximally extended intertrochlear groove. The distal vascular foramen is wide and deep, and is obliquely oriented. In spite of not being preserved, the base of trochlea II is separated from the rest of the shaft and is posteriorly oriented.
In posterior view the distal trochleae are poroximally delimited by a wide concave surface. A large and well-defined scar is present proximal to the articular surface of trochlea III. The articular surface of trochlea III is subtriangular in contour.
Remarks. The specimens reported here can be referred to Rallidae on the basis of a unique combination of characteristics, including a hypotarsus with a prominent lateral crest and a reduced medial one, intercotylar eminence relatively low and well-defined, and anteriorly projected, distal end of the bone with proximally extended articular surfaces of trochleae, trochlea II proximally positioned and tilted, and a large and prominent scar proximal to metatarsal III in posterior view (Mayr, 2006Mayr, G. (2006). A rail (Aves, Rallidae) from the early Oligocene of Germany. Ardea-Wageningen, 94(1), 23-31., 2016aMayr, G. (2016a). Variations in the hypotarsus morphology of birds and their evolutionary significance. Acta Zoologica, 97(2), 196-210., 2019Mayr, G. (2019). Hypotarsus morphology of the Ralloidea supports a clade comprising Sarothrura and Mentocrex to the exclusion of Canirallus. Acta Ornithologica, 54(1), 51-58.; Mayr and Smith, 2001Mayr, G., and Smith, R. (2001). Ducks, rails, and limicoline waders (Aves: Anseriformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes) from the lowermost Oligocene of Belgium. Geobios, 34(5), 547-561.).
Among rallids, the position of the specimens reported here is uncertain. The size and proportions are very similar to members of the genus Rallus (Olson, 1974Olson, S. L. (1974). A new species of Nesotrochis from Hispaniola, with notes on other fossil rails from the West Indies (Aves: Rallidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 87, 439-450.). They lack the flattened tarsometatarsus with an acute medial edge diagnostic of Porphyrio and kin (Mayr, 2019Mayr, G. (2019). Hypotarsus morphology of the Ralloidea supports a clade comprising Sarothrura and Mentocrex to the exclusion of Canirallus. Acta Ornithologica, 54(1), 51-58.; Olson, 1973Olson, S. L. (1973). A classification of the Rallidae. Wilson Bulletin, 85, 381-416). The metatarsal II trochlea is proximally positioned, in contrast with the more distal location observed in Himantornis (Olson, 1973Olson, S. L. (1973). A classification of the Rallidae. Wilson Bulletin, 85, 381-416).
Regrettably, the incomplete nature of the specimens reported here precludes a more accurate phylogenetic position among rallids.
Gruoidea sensu Wetmore, 1960
⌅Gruidae Vigors, 1825
?Gruinae Vigors, 1825
Genus Patagogrus nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Medium-sized gruid diagnosed on the basis of the following combination of characters: 1- distal end of the bone with its anteroposterior length subequal to transverse width (shared with Palaeogrus; much transversely wider than anteroposteriorly long in Grus); 2- intercondylar groove in distal view narrow and with subparallel lateral and medial margins (relatively wide and forming an opened “V” or “U” in Grus and Palaeogrus); 3- distal end of lateral condyle with a well-developed notch (shared with Grus, nearly absent in Palaeogrus); 4- medial condyle strongly anteriorly projected and with its anterior end acute and transversely narrow (shared with Palaeogrus; narrower in Grus); 5- medial epicondyle poorly developed (well-developed and exposed when viewed distally in Grus and Palaeogrus); 6- tubercle lateral to supratendinal bridge poorly developed (shared with Palaeogrus, in Grus the tubercle is very strong); and 7- proximodistally extended supratendinal bridge (shared with Grus).
Etymology. Patago, from Patagonia, and Grus, the type genus of Gruidae.
Type and only included species. Patagogrus olsoni nov. sp.
Patagogrus olsoni nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 1423, distal end of right tibiotarsus (Figure 10).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Etymology. The specific epithet honours Storrs L. Olson (1944-2020), one of the most important paleornithologists from the XX and XXI centuries.
Description. Cross-section of the shaft roughly crescent-shaped, with a flattened anterior surface. Distal end with lateral condyle much larger than the medial one, with a thicker base and anteroposteriorly shorter (21 milimeters of maximum transverse width through the distal condyles). Distal margin of lateral condyle with a poorly-developed notch. Medial epicondyle present but not strongly developed and not surpassing the medial condyle medially. In distal view the distal trochlea do not strongly taper posteriorly. Intercondylar groove transverselly narrow and subrectangular in contour, with nearly straight medial and lateral margins and with a distinct sub-horizontal scar anteriorly. Presence of a well-developed tubercle located at the lateral edge of the supratendinal bridge and not in contact with lateral condyle. Distal opening of extensor groove proximodistally narrow and transversely wide, located at the medial half of the bone. Supratendinal bridge proximodistally extensive and with a concave anterior surface. Lateral retinacular tubercle ridge-like, strongly developed and subvertically oriented. It is placed medially to the fibularis muscle groove and is separated from the tubercle located at the lateral surface of the supratendinal bridge by a shallow subvertical groove. The medial retinacular tubercle is obliquely oriented with respect to the main axis of the extensor groove; it is poorly developed and ridge-like. This tubercle is located medially with respect to the medial margin of the extensor groove.
In posterior view the distal trochlea is relatively proximodistally low and shows shallow rings and a poorly developed transverse ridge.
Remarks. Patagogrus nov.gen. shows a unique combination of characteristics shared with Gruidae, including flat anterior face of the tibiotarsus, proximodistally low distal trochlea in posterior view, anteriorly divergent condyles, lateral condyle anteroposteriorly long, with a shallow notch on its distal margin, medial condyle more anteriorly projected than the lateral one, anterior end of medial condyle transversely narrow, the presence of a tubercle lateral to the base of the supratendinal bridge, well developed ridge delimiting the lateral margin of the extensor groove, and supratendinal bridge proximodistally tall (Clarke et al., 2005Clarke, J.A., Norell, M.A., and Dashzeveg, D. (2005). New avian remains from the Eocene of Mongolia and the phylogenetic position of the Eogruidae (Aves, Gruoidea). American Museum Novitates, 2005(3494), 1-17.; Cracraft, 1973aCracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127.; Livezey, 1998Livezey, B.C. (1998). A phylogenetic analysis of the Gruiformes (Aves) based on morphological characters, with an emphasis on the rails (Rallidae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1378), 2077-2151.; Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.). Patagogrus differs from psilopterine phorusrhacids by having a slimmer configuration, more dorsoventrally lower and transversely wider distal condyles, by having a subelliptical external rim on the lateral condyle, a medial condyle much more deflected medially, not alligned with the medial margin of the shaft, an anterior intercondylar fossa, and a poorly excavated extensor groove, among other anatomical details (see Noriega et al. 2009Noriega, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2009). First record and a new species of seriema (Aves: Ralliformes: Cariamidae) from santacrucian (Early-Middle Miocene) beds of Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29(2), 620-626.).
Patagogrus clearly differs from cariamids in having the lateral condyle not anteriorly projected and with a reduced epicondyle, a proximodistally high supratendinal bridge, a transversely wide and proximodistally low distal opening of the supratendinal bridge, the presence of a tubercle lateral to the supratendinal bridge, and absence of a ridge connecting the lateral edge of the supratendinal bridge with the medial margin of the lateral condyle, among other features (Cracraft, 1968Cracraft, J. (1968). A review of the Bathornithidae (Aves, Gruiformes), with remarks on the relationships of the suborder Cariamae. American Museum Novitates, 2326, 1-46.; Noriega et al., 2009Noriega, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2009). First record and a new species of seriema (Aves: Ralliformes: Cariamidae) from santacrucian (Early-Middle Miocene) beds of Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29(2), 620-626.).
Among gruids, Patagogrus clearly differs from Balearica and extinct Balearicinae, previously referred to as Probalearica (Mourer Chauviré, 2001Mourer-Chauvire, C. (2001). The systematic position of the genus Basityto Mlikovsky, 1998 (Aves: Gruiformes: Gruidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 114(4), 964-971.), in that balearicines exhibit a robust distal end of the tibiotarsus with a strongly anteroposteriorly flattened shaft, a strongly medially deflected medial condyle, and a transversely expanded extensor groove (Feduccia and Voorhies, 1992Feduccia, A., and Voorhies, M.R. (1992). Crowned cranes (Gruidae: Balearica) in the Miocene of Nebraska. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series, 36, 239-248.; Mourer Chauviré, 2001Mourer-Chauvire, C. (2001). The systematic position of the genus Basityto Mlikovsky, 1998 (Aves: Gruiformes: Gruidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 114(4), 964-971.). On the other side, Patagogrus resembles gruines in having a progressive (not abrupt) widening of the distal end of the bone, in the presence of a strong tubercle lateral to the supratendinal bridge, a relatively long lateral condyle, a transversely narrow extensor groove occupying only the medial part of the cranial face of the bone, and a notch at the distal edge of lateral condyle forming an indentation that is much less pronounced in the Balearicinae (Göhlich, 2003Göhlich, U.B. (2003). A new crane (Aves: Gruidae) from the Miocene of Germany. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(2), 387-393.; Mourer Chauviré, 2001Mourer-Chauvire, C. (2001). The systematic position of the genus Basityto Mlikovsky, 1998 (Aves: Gruiformes: Gruidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 114(4), 964-971.).
Tertiary gruines are still poorly known. Several previously published records rest on weak evidence and they are considered to be of uncertain phylogenetic affinities (Cracraft, 1973aCracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127.; Göhlich, 2003Göhlich, U.B. (2003). A new crane (Aves: Gruidae) from the Miocene of Germany. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(2), 387-393.), which makes comparisons of Patagogrus with other fossil gruines difficult. The only Tertiary extinct gruine genera that rest on relatively robust evidence are Palaeogrus and Camusia (e.g., Göhlich, 2003Göhlich, U.B. (2003). A new crane (Aves: Gruidae) from the Miocene of Germany. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(2), 387-393.; Mayr et al., 2020bMayr, G., Lechner, T., and Böhme, M. (2020b). A skull of a very large crane from the late Miocene of Southern Germany, with notes on the phylogenetic interrelationships of extant Gruinae. Journal of Ornithology, 161(4), 923-933.; Mourer-Chauviré, 2001Mourer-Chauvire, C. (2001). The systematic position of the genus Basityto Mlikovsky, 1998 (Aves: Gruiformes: Gruidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 114(4), 964-971.; Seguí, 2002Seguí, B. (2002). A new genus of crane (Aves: Gruiformes) from the Late Tertiary of the Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean. Ibis, 144, 411−422.; Zelenkov, 2015Zelenkov, N.V. (2015) The fossil record and evolutionary history of cranes. In: Ilyashenko EI, Winter SV (eds) Cranes of Eurasia (biology, distribution, captive breeding). 5. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Cranes of Eurasia: biology, conservation, management”, Daursky Nature Reserve, Transbaikalia, Russia, 1‒4 September 2015. Crane Working Group of Eurasia, Moscow and Nizhny Tsasuchei, Russia, pp. 88-90). Comparisons between Patagogrus, Palaeogrus and the extant genus Grus were made in the diagnosis of Patagogrus following characteristics noted by previous authors (Cracraft, 1973aCracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127.; Göhlich, 2003Göhlich, U.B. (2003). A new crane (Aves: Gruidae) from the Miocene of Germany. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(2), 387-393.; Northcote and Mourer-Chauviré, 1988Northcote, E. M., and Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1988). The extinct crane Grus primigenia Milne-Edwards in Majorca (Spain). Geobios, 21(2), 201-208.). Camusia is very different from Patagogrus and any other gruid genus (Seguí, 2002Seguí, B. (2002). A new genus of crane (Aves: Gruiformes) from the Late Tertiary of the Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean. Ibis, 144, 411−422.). It differs from Patagogrus in several anatomical details, including a tibiotarsus with a much transversely wider and anteroposteriorly flattened distal end, by having narrower and a more medially projected medial condyle and a prominent and elongate medial epicondyle.
The combination of characteristics enumerated above indicates that Patagogrus is a valid gruid genus. Among other anatomical details, it is distinctive in having a transversely narrow distal end of the tibiotarsus, as is shown by the shape of the intercondylar groove in distal view.
Psophiidae Bonaparte 1831
⌅Genus Archaeopsophia nov. gen.
Diagnosis. A medium-sized gruoid closely related to psophiids and parvigruids from which it differs in the following combination of characteristics: 1- proximally extended and well-defined intercotylar eminence (condition similar to Psophiidae; much lower in Parvigruidae); 2- hypotarsus distally located (very proximally located in Parvigruidae, close to the level of the proximal cotyles; similar condition to Archaeopsophia is present in Psophiidae); 3- medial crest for the flexor digitorum longus anteroposteriorly short (long in Psophiidae; condition similar to Parvigruidae); 4- hypotarsus lateral to the flexor digitorum longus groove forming a nearly subparallel surface with respect to the main transverse axis of the bone (disposed on an oblique angle in Psophiidae; condition similar to Parvigruidae); 5- groove for the fibularis longus shallower than in Psophiidae; and 6- groove for the flexor hallucis longus notably transversely wide (very narrow in Parvigruidae).
Etymology. Archaeo, from the Greek, meaining ancient; Psophia, the type genus of Psophiidae.
Type and only included species. Archaeopsophia aoni nov. sp.
Archaeopsophia aoni nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 3422, proximal end of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 11).
Locality and horizon. The specimen comes from the Santa Cruz Formation (Early-Middle Miocene), at the well-known fossiliferous locality of Monte Observación, Monte León National Park, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. Collected in 1991.
Etymology. Aoni, from the Aonikenk, meaning south.
Description. Proximal end of tarsometatarsus poorly transversely expanded (21 milimeters of maximum transverse width). The intercotylar eminence is distinctly proximally extended and anteroposteriorly narrow. Proximal cotyles strongly concave and delimited by rising outside margins. The medial cotyle is situated farther proximally than the lateral one. The infracotylar fossa is deep and well-defined, and shows three very small proximal vascular foramina.
In proximal view the medial cotyle is much larger than the lateral one, and exhibits a subrectangular contour. Intercotylar area relatively wide, subrectangular in contour and deeply excavated.
In posterior view the hypotarsus is distally displaced and is separated from the proximal cotyles by a very deep and well-defined subhorizontally oriented excavation. The hypotarsus is relatively complex and is not strongly posteriorly projected. It does not enclose bony canals. Its most prominent crest is the medial crest for the flexor digitorum longus, which is not strongly posteriorly extended and is close in size to the lateral crest for the flexor digitorum longus. The medial crest for the flexor digitorum longus is proximodistally long. The grooves for the flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallucis longus are well-defined, especially when viewed posteriorly. The lateral crest for the flexor hallucis longus is thick and blunt, but not prominent.
The fossa parahypotarsalis lateralis appears to have been poorly developed. There is a low crista plantaris lateralis along the midsection of the shaft.
Remarks. Archaeopsophia aoni nov. sp. shows a hypotarsal morphology exclusive to Gruoidea: there is a lateral sulcus for the tendon of musculus fibularis longus, the hypotarsus forms a laterally slanted embossment, there is a groove for the flexor digitorum longus tendon, and a proximodistally long crista medialis partially or entirely enclosing such a groove (Cracraft, 1973aCracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127.; Mayr, 2016aMayr, G. (2016a). Variations in the hypotarsus morphology of birds and their evolutionary significance. Acta Zoologica, 97(2), 196-210.). Among gruoids, Archaeopsophia exhibits a hypotarsal morphology that only fits with that of the Psophiidae and Parvigruidae. In most ralloids, and in all gruids and aramids, the canal for the flexor digitorum longus is entirely closed, whereas in Archaeopsophia, Psophiidae, and Parvigruidae it is represented by an opened groove (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89., 2016aMayr, G. (2016a). Variations in the hypotarsus morphology of birds and their evolutionary significance. Acta Zoologica, 97(2), 196-210.). Furthermore, in Archaeopsophia, Psophia, and gruoids more derived than parvigruids the medial crest for the flexoris digitorum longus is proximodistally extensive, whereas in Parvigrus it is notably shorter (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.). In addition, Archaeopsophia resembles psophiids and differs from parvigruids in having a proximally extended and well-defined intercotylar eminence, a distally displaced hypotarsus, and a groove for the flexor hallucis longus that is notably transversely wide. Furthermore, as in Psophiidae and Aramidae, there exits a well-defined groove for the flexor hallucis longus lateral to the medial hypotarsal crest. The hypotarsus of Archaeopsophia is very different from the condition exhibited by cariamiforms, which share a block-like hypotarsus lacking deep grooves and crests (Alvarenga and Hofling, 2003Alvarenga, H.M., and Höfling, E. (2003). Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 43(4), 55-91.; De Pietri and Mayr, 2014De Pietri, V.L., and Mayr, G. (2014). The enigmatic Ibidopodia from the early Miocene of France-the first Neogene record of Cariamiformes (Aves) in Europe. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 34(6), 1470-1475.). On the basis of this combination of characters, Archaeopsophia is referred here to the Psophiidae.
Anisolornis excavatus is an enigmatic bird coming from early Miocene Santacrucian beds at the Karaiken fossil site in Santa Cruz province. The specimen was originally considered by Ameghino as being a phororhacoid bird (1891)Ameghino, F. (1891). Enumeración de las aves fósiles de la República Argentina. Revista Argentina de Historia Natural, 1, 441- 453. and later as a galliform bird (1895Ameghino, F. (1895). Sur les oiseaux fossiles de Patagonie. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 15, 501- 602.). More recently, Cracraft (1973a)Cracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127. included it among aramids and Olson (1985)Olson, S. L. (1985). The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 79-238 noted resemblances to Psophiidae. However, the affinities of Anisolornis with psophiids, and even gruiformes, are far from being well-settled (Tambussi and Degrange, 2013). Anisolornis is based on a distal tarsometatarsus, and thus, direct comparisons with Archaeopsophia are not possible. In any case, Anisolornis belongs to a relatively large bird, much bigger than Archaeopsophia (see Cracraft, 1973aCracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127.).
Parvigruidae Mayr, 2005Mayr, G. (2005). A chicken-sized crane precursor from the early Oligocene of France. Naturwissenschaften, 92(8), 389-393.
⌅Genus Alhuenia nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Small-sized gruoid closely related to psophiids and parvigruids from which it differs in the following combination of characteristics: 1- distal end of the humerus anteroposteriorly flattened (similar to Psophia and gruids, thicker in Parvigrus); 2- robust dorsal condyle with a bulbous distal end (narrower in Parvigrus and narrow and ventrally excavated in Psophia); 3- attachment of the tendon of the m. carpi radialis represented by low and elongate scar (more prominent in Parvigrus); 4- proximal margin of the brachial fossa poorly delimited (similar to Parvigrus, more excavated and delimited by a ridge in Psophia); 5- flexor tubercle not distally extended (similar to Parvigrus, strongly distally projected in Psophia); 6- distal end of the humerus not ventrally slanted (slanted in Parvigrus and ralloids); and 7- humerotricipital groove not delimited by subvertical ridges (ridges present in Parvigrus).
Etymology. Alhue, from the Mapundugún, meaning phantom.
Type and only included species. Alhuenia eduardotonnii nov. sp.
Alhuenia eduardotonnii nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 1439, distal end of right humerus (Figure 12).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Description. The distal end of the humerus of Alhuenia is not strongly transversely expanded (13 milimeters of maximum transverse width). In spite of being not entirely preserved, the flexor process was not strongly ventrally projected, a condition shared with gruoids and different from ralloids (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.). This results in the ventral edge of the bone being straight and not ventrally slanted.
The entepicondylar process is strongly anteriorly projected and is proximally continuous with a ridge that delimits the medial margin of the bone, a condition shared with gruoids excluding parvigruids (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.). The attachment scar for the tendon of the anterior articular ligament, distal to the entepicondylar process, is prominent. The brachial fossa is not well-excavated and roughly ellipsoidal in contour. It is centrally positioned, as occurs in most gruoids (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.), and is not distally displaced. Both dorsal and ventral condyles are prominent and rounded, and are separated by a deep and wide intercondylar groove. The ventral condyle is roughly subcircular in contour. Proximal to the dorsal condyle, there is a thick attachment area for the tendon of m. carpi radialis. This area is elongate and is not prominent.
In posterior view, both scapulotricipitalis and humerotricipitalis grooves are wide and shallow. The olecranal fossa is relatively deep and well-defined.
Remarks. The distal end of the humerus of Alhuenia nov. gen. clearly differs from other gruiforms and cariamiforms, and resembles parvigruids in the following unique combination of characteristics: distal end of the bone not ventrally slanted (a condition shared with gruoids and contrasting with rallids, messelornithids and other gruiforms and cariamiforms; Mourer-Chauviré, 1983Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1983). Les Gruiformes (Aves) Des Phosphorites Du Quercy (France): 1, Sous-ordre Cariamae (Cariamidae Et Phorusrhacidae): Systématique et Biostratigraphie. Palæovertebrata, 13, 83-143.; 1995Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1995): The Messelornithidae (Aves: Gruiformes) from the Paleogene of France. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 181, 95-105.) and not strongly transversely expanded (notably expanded in Psophia), the proximal end of the ectepicondylar process is markedly projected anteriorly (weakly elevated in gruoids, including psophiids; Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.), attachment for anterior articular ligament prominent (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.), brachial fossa shallow and not proximally delimited by a ridge (more excavated in psophiids and gruids; Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.); brachial fossa intermediate in position between the centrally located position of gruoids and the ventrally situated position of ralloids (Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.), dorsal condyle robust and not strongly compressed (shared also with gruids; strongly compressed in Psophia; Mayr, 2002Mayr, G. (2002). A new specimen of Salmila robusta (Aves: Gruiformes: Salmilidae n. fam.) from the Middle Eocene of Messel. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 76(2), 305-316., 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.), ventral condyle globular and distally extended beyond the level of the flexor process and dorsal condyle (Mayr and Smith, 2001Mayr, G., and Smith, R. (2001). Ducks, rails, and limicoline waders (Aves: Anseriformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes) from the lowermost Oligocene of Belgium. Geobios, 34(5), 547-561.), and ventral condyle separated from the dorsal one by a deep groove (groove shallower and ventral condyle elongate in cariamiforms; Mayr, 2002Mayr, G. (2002). A new specimen of Salmila robusta (Aves: Gruiformes: Salmilidae n. fam.) from the Middle Eocene of Messel. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 76(2), 305-316.). Furthermore, Alhuenia shows important differences with Psophia which include a very different shape of the dorsal condyle and much narrower and not strongly distally divergent humeral margins (see Mayr, 2013aMayr, G. (2013a). Parvigruidae (Aves, core Gruiformes) from the early Oligocene of Belgium. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 93(1), 77-89.).
As indicated in the diagnosis, Alhuenia shows several features that distinguish it from the parvigruids Parvigrus and Rupelrallus, particularly the less distally extensive flexor tubercle and the more robust and globose dorsal condyle, among other anatomical details (see Mayr, 2005Mayr, G. (2005). A chicken-sized crane precursor from the early Oligocene of France. Naturwissenschaften, 92(8), 389-393.; 2013). In spite of not being directly compared to the psophiid Archaeopsophia and the enigmatic Anisolornis, the distal humerus of Alhuenia belongs to a much smaller bird than expected for Archaeopsophia and Anisolornis, as inferred by their tarsometatarsi.
Falconiformes Sharpe, 1874
⌅Falconidae Leach, 1820
Genus Caroohierax nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Very small falconid diagnosed on the basis of the following unique combination of characters: 1- subtriangular cross-section of metatarsal shaft; 2- well-delimited and deep extensor groove forming a canal; 3- poorly defined surface of the impression for the m. abductor digiti II; 4- posterior surface of the shaft lacking prominent plantar crests; 5- metatarsal II trochlea strongly distally extended and transversely narrow, well-separated from the posteromedial wing; 6- posteromedial wing strongly medially oriented and proximally extended; and 7- metatarsal trochlea IV laterally delimited by a wide, flattened and obliquely oriented lateral surface.
Etymology. Caroo, from the Aonikenk language, meaning carancho (in spanish) or caracara; hierax, from the Greek, meaning falcon.
Type and only included species. Caroohierax rapoporti nov. sp.
Caroohierax rapoporti nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 1400, distal end of left tarsometatarsus with somewhat eroded distal trochleae (Figure 13).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Etymology. In honour of Eduardo Rapoport (1927-2017) one of the most prominent Argentine biologists who greatly contributed to the knowledge of the biogeography and ecology of the southern cone.
Description. Very small falconid (maximum preserved distal width of tarsometatarsus is 4 mm).
The distal end of the tarsometatarsus shows a roughly subtriangular cross-section of the shaft with a nearly flattened anterior surface and a poorly excavated posterior one. The preserved proximal portion is relatively narrow, which suggests a gracile and elongate shaft. Plantar crests are not well-defined.
The distal end of the extensor groove is very deep and delimited by prominent margins. It lacks any sign of a double opening. The opening of the distal vascular foramen is relatively small and is distally positioned. In posterior view the impression of the adductor digiti II is transversely narrow and well-defined.
In anterior view the surface for the m. abductor digiti II is poorly developed, barely defined, and not medially extended. Proximal to the IV metatarsal trochlea there is a wide, anterolaterally facing flattened surface that is obliquely oriented.
The metatarsal fossa I is shallow and distally positioned. The opening of the distal interosseus canal is situated at the lateral intertrochlear incisure. A well defined posterior supratrochlear fossa is present.
In anterior view the distal trochleae are subequally distally extended, with the trochlea II more slightly distally extended than trochlea III. The preserved part of trochlea metatarsal IV indicates a prominent posterior wing. Metatarsal II trochlea with a prominent posteromedial wing is strongly medially oriented. In spite of being poorly preserved, its base indicates that it was strongly proximodistally extended. In lateral view a well-defined lateral fossa for the collateral ligament is present. The articular surface of metatarsal II trochlea is nearly flat, transversely narrow, and subrectangular in shape in anterior view.
The III metatarsal trochlea in anterior view appears to be relatively elongate, with deep and well-defined rims separated by a deep and well-defined longitudinal groove. In distal view the trochlear rims are relatively prominent and acute.
Remarks. In spite of the poor preservation of the only known Caroohierax specimen, it strongly departs from the morphology of other Miocene falconids. In fact, it shows a unique combination of features that make it difficult to assign it to any falconid subclade (see Becker, 1987Becker, J.J. (1987). Revision of “Falco” ramenta Wetmore and the Neogene evolution of the Falconidae. The Auk, 104(2), 270-276.; Cenizo et al., 2013; Noriega et al., 2011Noriega, J.I., Areta, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2011). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the patagonian Miocene falcon Thegornis musculosus Ameghino, 1895 (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Paleontology, 85(6), 1089-1104.). It shows several features similar to that of Herpetotheriinae, including a subtriangular cross-section of the shaft, and a prominent and posteriorly oriented wing on metatarsal trochlea IV. Furthermore, Caroohierax differs from Falconini and Polyborini in that the extensor groove of digit IV lacks any sign of a double opening (Cenizo et al., 2013), the opening of the distal interosseus canal is located within the lateral intertrochlear incisure and lacks a proximally extended posterior notch. Additionally, Caroohierax differs from polyborines in the different shape and proportions of the distal trochleae, as well as in the absence of rugosities and pits delimiting the distal end of the surface for the m. abductor digiti II.
However, in spite of the similarities noted above, Caroohierax differs from herpetotheriines in having a small and poorly defined surface for the m. abductor digiti II (such a wide surface is also widespread in falconines), in lacking well-defined plantar ridges and strongly excavated anterior and posterior metatarsal surfaces, and in lacking a wide and deep impression for the m. adductor digiti II. The shape of trochlea II in Caroohierax differs from that of herpetotheriines such as Thegornis, Herpetotheres and Micrastur in having a narrow and distally extended articular body (see Noriega et al., 2011Noriega, J.I., Areta, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2011). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the patagonian Miocene falcon Thegornis musculosus Ameghino, 1895 (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Paleontology, 85(6), 1089-1104.).
Caroohierax differs from the basal falconid Antarctoboenus in having a deep and well-defined impression for the m. adductor digiti II, in the distal extension of trochlea II, in having narrow intertrochlear spaces, a narrow and deep extensor groove, and in stouter distal trochleae, among other features (Cenizo et al., 2013).
Herpetotheriinae Lesson, 1842
⌅Genus ThegornisAmeghino, 1895Ameghino, F. (1895). Sur les oiseaux fossiles de Patagonie. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 15, 501- 602.
Thegornis spivacowi nov. sp.
Diagnosis. Very small Thegornis species distinguishable by the following combination of characters: 1- tarsometatarsus in distal view with metatarsal IV trochlea having the posterior wing well-separated from the main body of the trochlea, resulting in a sigmoidal outer margin of the trochlea IV; 2- trochlea II robust and rounded, with a distal notch separating the anterior articular surface from the posterior wing; and 3- proximal ridge resulting in a medial prominence dorsal to the articular surface of trochlea II.
Holotype. MACN-SC 1407, distal end of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 14).
Paratypes. MACN-SC 1390, distal end of left tarsometatarsus lacking II trochlea (Figure 15 A-F); MACN-SC 1393, distal end of left tarsometatarsus lacking IV trochlea (Figure 15 J-M); MACN-SC 1396, distal end of left tarsometatarsus lacking IV trochlea (Figure 15 Q-S); MACN-SC 4510, distal end of right tarsometatarsus lacking IV trochlea (Figure 15 G-I); MACN-SC 4511, distal end of left tarsometatarsus with partially eroded distal trochleae (Figure 15 N-P).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation. The specimen MACN-SC 4511 comes from the Portezuelo Sumich locality (see Bown and Larriestra, 1990Bown, T.M., and Larriestra, C.N. (1990). Sedimentary paleoenvironments of fossil platyrrhine localities, Miocene Pinturas Formation, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. In The Platyrrhine Fossil Record (pp. 87-119). Academic Press.).
Etymology. Honouring José Boris Spivacow (1915-1994), editor of EUDEBA and Centro Editor de América Latina. Due to his efforts, more than 5000 titles were published, and without any doubt his projects have been of capital importance for Argentine cultural heritage.
Description. Small-sized Thegornis species (the largest tarsometatarsus, MACN-SC 1407, having 1.7 cm. of maximum distal transverse width). The metatarsal shaft is roughly “H”-shaped in cross-section. It shows a well defined, but shallow anterior metatarsal groove that is delimited by longitudinal ridges, the lateral one much more prominent than the medial one, resulting in the lateral half being more anteroposteriorly extended than the medial half of the bone. The extensor groove ends on a large and proximodistally extended distal vascular foramen. This groove forms a well-defined and deep canal.
In posterior view the metatarsal shaft is deeply excavated and delimited by two longitudinal plantar ridges. Metatarsal I impression is deep and crescent-shaped, with a proximal margin delimited by a prominent ridge.
The second metatarsal trochlea has a distinctively-formed articular body, which is rounded and ovoidal in contour. The posteromedial wing is well-defined and separated from the main body of the trochlea by a groove and a smooth depression. Metatarsal III trochlea is separated from the II trochlea by a well-defined and narrow intertrochlear incisure. The outer rim of trochlea III is more prominent than the inner rim.
The articular surface of trochlea IV is relatively transversely narrow and subrectangular in contour. In distal view it is laterally inclined. The posterior wing is slightly medially oriented and is separated from the main body of the trochlea by a transverse constriction. This also grades into a concave lateral margin of the main body of the trochlea, which results in a sigmoidal outline.
Remarks. The material belonging to T. spivacowi nov. sp. was previously identified as a caracarine falconid by Chiappe (1991)Chiappe, L.M. (1991). Fossil birds from the Miocene Pinturas Formation of southern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(Suppl), R21-22.. On the contrary, Thegornis spivacowi nov. can be nested among herpetotheriine falconids based on having the following combination of features, including the roughly “H” shaped metatarsal shaft with a prominent lateral anterior ridge, resulting in a nearly subtriangular general contour and in a very wide and extended impression of the m abductor digiti II, metatarsal II trochlea with posteromedial wing slightly medially oriented, rounded and prominent articular surface of trochlea II, the lateral trochlear rim of metatarsal III trochlea more posteriorly extended than the medial one, relatively thin trochlea IV and extensive posterior wing of metatarsal IV trochlea (Noriega et al., 2011Noriega, J.I., Areta, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2011). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the patagonian Miocene falcon Thegornis musculosus Ameghino, 1895 (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Paleontology, 85(6), 1089-1104.; Cenizo et al., 2013). Thegornis spivacowi comfortably fits within the genus Thegornis, with which it shares a tarsometatarsus with the anterior surface excavated and delimited by sharp ridges intermediate in size between Micrastur and Herpetotheres, an anterolateral margin of shaft elevated as a prominent border, resulting in a roughly subtriangular contour of the shaft, a relatively low posterior lateral metatarsal ridge, large and deep metatarsal I fossa that it is proximally delimited by a prominent ridge, trochlea II slightly grooved, and posteromedial wing of trochlea II relatively thin, well-defined and strongly medially tilted.
Ameghino (1895)Ameghino, F. (1895). Sur les oiseaux fossiles de Patagonie. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 15, 501- 602. coined the falconid genus Thegornis with the aim of including the Santacrucian species Thegornis musculosus and T. debilis, which were distinguished mostly by their disparate size. Later, Thegornis was assigned to Accipitridae (Brodkorb, 1964Brodkorb, P. (1964). Catalogue of Fossil Birds: Part 2: Anseriformes Through Galliformes. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, 8, 1-150.; Agnolín, 2006bAgnolín, F.L. (2006b). Notas sobre el registro de Accipitridae (Aves, Accipitriformes) fósiles argentinos. Studia Geologica Salmanticensia, 42, 67-80.). However more recently, Noriega et al. (2011)Noriega, J.I., Areta, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2011). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the patagonian Miocene falcon Thegornis musculosus Ameghino, 1895 (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Paleontology, 85(6), 1089-1104. based on newly collected specimens, including a nearly complete skeleton, referred Thegornis to the family Falconidae, Subfamily Herpetotherinae. They also sustained that the size difference between T. debilis and T. musculosus may fit the sexual dimorphism present in extant falconids and considered that the only valid species is T. musculosus, a criterion with which I concur.
T. spivacowi comes from younger beds than those which yielded T. musculosus. In spite of their similarities, T. spivacowi is a smaller species that can be distinguished by details of the distal trochleae of tarsometatarsus. These include a different shape of metatarsal IV trochlea with a well-defined posterior wing and strongly sigmoidal lateral margin. The prominent and rounded metatarsal II articular surface of T. spivacowi nov. resembles the condition of buteonine accipitrids (Noriega et al., 2011Noriega, J.I., Areta, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2011). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the patagonian Miocene falcon Thegornis musculosus Ameghino, 1895 (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Paleontology, 85(6), 1089-1104.). However, in contrast with Thegornis musculosus the ventral margin of the trochlea II is not complete, with the anterior articular surface being separated from the posteromedial wing by a distal notch.
Strigiformes Wagler, 1830
⌅?Sophiornithidae Mourer-Chauviré, 1987Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1987). Les Strigiformes (Aves) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France): systématique, biostratigraphie et paléobiogéographie. Travaux et Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 99(1), 89-135.
Genus Enskenia nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Medium-sized owl diagnosed on the basis of the following unique combination of features: 1- distal trochleae forming an opened “U” in distal view; 2- metatarsal trochlea IV small, poorly excavated, and laterally deflected; 3- metatarsal trochlea III proximodistally short (especially in posterior view), with a well-defined and proximally raised margin; 4- outer rim of metatarsal III trochlea obliquely oriented; 5- distal margin of metatarsal III trochlea distally concave; 6- medial metatarsal plantar ridge prominent and acute; and 7- distal vascular foramen wide and distally positioned, distally surrounded by a concave pit.
Etymology. Ensken, meaning “night” in Aonikenk language.
Type and only known species. Enskenia galeanoi nov. sp.
Enskenia galeanoi nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 1609, distal end of right tarsometatarsus lacking trochlea II (Figure 16 A-I).
Paratypes. MACN SC 1421, distal end of right tarsometatarsus, lacking II and IV trochleae (Figure 16 J-N); MACN SC 1430, trochlea III of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 16 O-R).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas river, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimen comes from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Etymology. Honouring Eduardo Galeano (1940-2015), born in Uruguay, one of the most preeminent Latin American writers.
Description. A medium-sized owl the size of Asio flammeus (maximum distal width of holotype is 12 milimeters). The preserved part of the tarsometatarsus suggests a relatively stout element with a transversely wide shaft. The lateral and medial margins of the shaft are gently concave.
The preserved portion of the shaft in anterior view is flattened and lacks any sign of excavation. The distal vascular foramen is slit-like and continues distally as a small fossa which distally ends on a deep pit. This fossa ends level to the proximal end of IV metatarsal trochlea. The IV metatarsal trochlea is strongly laterally deflected. The wing-like posterior flange of trochlea IV is deep. In distal view it forms an angle between 75° to 80° with the horizontal plane.
Metatarsal III trochlea is proximodistally short and stout, and it is well-raised with respect to the metatarsal shaft. The rims are relatively robust, well-defined, and are separated by a middle longitudinal groove. The trochlea III shows a subtle asymmetry in distal view, with the rims having subequal distal extent. The lateral rim of the trochlea is relatively thick and more posteriorly extended than the medial rim. In spite of having broken off, the II metatarsal trochlea shows a poorly-defined and low plantar ridge.
The distal end of the bone forms a wide arch, not strongly “U” shaped. Metatarsal I fossa is weakly indicated and located at the posterior margin of the shaft. Posterior metatarsal groove is very shallow.
Remarks. In spite of being poorly preserved, the tarsometatarsus of Enskenia nov. gen. shows a unique combination of characters that allows for recognizing its affinities among strigiforms. In contrast to crown-Strigiformes, Paleoglaucidae, Protostrigidae, and Ogygoptyngidae it shows poorly excavated anterior and posterior metatarsal grooves (despite being incompletely preserved, the anterior surface of the bone in most owls shows a concave surface that reaches the level of the distal vascular foramen), and a poorly arched distal end of the bone (Vickers Rich and Bohaska, 1981Vickers Rich, P., and Bohaska, D.J. (1981). The Ogygoptyngidae, a new family of owls from the Paleocene of North America. Alcheringa, 5(2), 95-102.; Mourer-Chauviré, 1987Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1987). Les Strigiformes (Aves) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France): systématique, biostratigraphie et paléobiogéographie. Travaux et Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 99(1), 89-135., 1994Mourer-Chauvire, C. (1994). A large owl from the Palaeocene of France. Palaeontology, 37(2), 339-348.; Mayr, 2016bMayr, G. (2016b). The world’s smallest owl, the earliest unambiguous charadriiform bird, and other avian remains from the early Eocene Nanjemoy Formation of Virginia (USA). Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 90(4), 747-763.), a combination of characteristics that distinguish the extinct clade Sophiornithidae. Furthermore, Enskenia differs from Protostrigidae, Paleoglaucidae, and Ogygoptyngidae in having a robust and transversely wide tarsometatarsus shaft (Martin and Black, 1972; Mayr, 2016bMayr, G. (2016b). The world’s smallest owl, the earliest unambiguous charadriiform bird, and other avian remains from the early Eocene Nanjemoy Formation of Virginia (USA). Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 90(4), 747-763.; Mourer-Chauviré, 1987Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1987). Les Strigiformes (Aves) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France): systématique, biostratigraphie et paléobiogéographie. Travaux et Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 99(1), 89-135., 1994Mourer-Chauvire, C. (1994). A large owl from the Palaeocene of France. Palaeontology, 37(2), 339-348.; Peters, 1992Peters, D.S. (1992). A new species of owl (Aves: Strigiformes) from the Middle Eocene Messel oil shale. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, 36, 161-169.; Vickers Rich and Bohaska, 1981Vickers Rich, P., and Bohaska, D.J. (1981). The Ogygoptyngidae, a new family of owls from the Paleocene of North America. Alcheringa, 5(2), 95-102.). In spite of little overlapping material, Enskenia differs from the enigmatic Primoptynx in having a deeply grooved trochlea III with prominent condyles, and trochlea IV not strongly transversely compressed (Mayr et al., 2021). Moreover, the tarsometatarsus of Enskenia appears to be much more robust than the elongate one of Primoptynx (Mayr et al., 2020aMayr, G., Gingerich, P.D., and Smith, T. (2020a). Skeleton of a new owl from the early Eocene of North America (Aves, Strigiformes) with an accipitrid-like foot morphology. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 40(2), e1769116.).
Enskenia is very similar in shape and size to that of other sophiornithids, including the genera Sophiornis and Berruornis (Mourer-Chauviré, 1987Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1987). Les Strigiformes (Aves) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France): systématique, biostratigraphie et paléobiogéographie. Travaux et Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 99(1), 89-135., 1994Mourer-Chauvire, C. (1994). A large owl from the Palaeocene of France. Palaeontology, 37(2), 339-348.). Comparisons with the genus Sophiornis are difficult because of few overlapping characteristics. However, Enskenia differs in having the distal end of the bone transversely narrower, and in having a more proximally positioned distal vascular foramen, which is far from the proximal margin of the trochlea III (a condition shared with Berruornis; Mourer-Chauviré, 1994Mourer-Chauvire, C. (1994). A large owl from the Palaeocene of France. Palaeontology, 37(2), 339-348.). This contrasts with Sophiornis, where the foramen is located on level with the trochlea III and is very close to its proximal margin. Furthermore, in Enskenia the metatarsal I fossa is shallower and narrower than in Sophiornis (Mourer-Chauviré, 1987Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1987). Les Strigiformes (Aves) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France): systématique, biostratigraphie et paléobiogéographie. Travaux et Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 99(1), 89-135.).
Enskenia differs from Berruornis in having metatarsal trochlea III strongly raised from the metatarsal shaft and with deep trochlear rims (Mourer-Chauviré, 1994Mourer-Chauvire, C. (1994). A large owl from the Palaeocene of France. Palaeontology, 37(2), 339-348.). The trochlea IV in Enskenia is strongly laterally oriented, a condition that departs from that of Berruornis.
Coraciiformes sensu Mayr, 1998
⌅Coracii Wetmore and Miller, 1926
Coraciidae Batsch, 1788
Genus Chehuenia nov. gen.
Diagnosis. Coraciid diagnosed on the basis of the following unique combination of characteristics: 1- very large trochlea II with a proximally extended medial wing; 2- posteromedial wing of metatarsal trochlea II strongly posteriorly extended; 3- poorly excavated posterior surface of trochlea II; 4- IV metatarsal trochlea only slightly shorter than trochlea III and the latter longer than II metatarsal trochlea; 5- transversely narrow IV metatarsal trochlea; 6- proximally positioned distal vascular foramen; and 7- deep longitudinal groove separating metatarsals II and III in posterior view.
Etymology. Cheuen, from the Aonikenk language: little bird.
Type and only included species. Chehuenia facongrandei nov. sp.
Chehuenia facongrandei nov. sp.
Diagnosis. The same as for genus by monotypy.
Holotype. MACN SC 4512, distal end of left tarsometatarsus (Figure 17).
Locality and horizon. The specimen comes from the Santa Cruz Formation (Early-Middle Miocene), at the well-known fossiliferous locality of Monte León (the label indicates “Estaca 3”), Monte León National Park, Santa Cruz province, Argentina.
Etymology. facongrandei, honouring José Font “Facón Grande” (1883-1921), an Argentine worker and anarcho-syndicalist, killed during rural strikes in Patagonia by 1921.
Description and comparisons. The distal end of the tarsometatarsus is anteroposteriorly flat and transversely wide (4.5 milimeters of maximum distal width). On the anterior face, the distal vascular foramen is proximally positioned and is proximodistally elongate. As with other coraciids, the distal vascular foramen is obliquely oriented from its anterior opening, which is anterolaterally located to its posterior opening, which is posteromedially located. This foramen is located at the end of the very deep and well-defined outer extensor groove. Metatarsal trochlea IV is only slightly more distally extended with respect to trochlea III. II metatarsal trochlea is shorter than trochlea III, which shows well defined and prominent rims separated by a deep longitudinal groove. IV trochlea is transversely narrow and subrectangular in contour. II trochlea is robust and proximodistally extended, with a prominent medial wing that contrasts with the smaller one observed in other coraciids such as Miocoracias (Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).). The distal interosseous canal is deep and well defined.
In posterior view the shaft proximal to the trochleae is notably concave. The posterior opening of the distal vascular foramen is ovoidal in contour and is strongly proximomedially oriented. There is a proximal longitudinal groove separating metatarsals IV and III. The distal interosseous canal is shallow and poorly defined. II metatarsal trochlea is thick, with a very well-developed posteromedial wing. The proximal end of trochlea III is not raised. Posterior surface of trochlea II is poorly excavated. IV metatarsal trochlea has a well-developed posterior wing. Metatarsal fossa I is well-defined and proximally placed, as occurs in Coracias. In distal view the trochleae form a “U” shaped open arch.
Remarks. The tarsometatarsus of Chehuenia nov. gen. is referable to Coraciidae on the basis of the following unique combination of characteristics (Bourdon et al., 2016Bourdon, E., Kristoffersen, A.V., and Bonde, N. (2016). A roller-like bird (Coracii) from the Early Eocene of Denmark. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1-9.; Degrange et al., 2021Degrange, F.J., Pol, D., Puerta, P., and Wilf, P. (2021). Unexpected larger distribution of paleogene stem-rollers (Aves, Coracii): new evidence from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-9.; Mayr, 2022Mayr, G. (2022). A partial skeleton of Septencoracias from the early Eocene London Clay reveals derived features of bee-eaters (Meropidae) in a putative stem group roller (Aves, Coracii). Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 102, 449-463.; Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré, 2000Mayr, G., and Mourer-Chauviré, C. (2000). Rollers (Aves: Coraciiformes ss) from the middle Eocene of Messel (Germany) and the upper Eocene of the Quercy (France). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20(3), 533-546.; Mourer-Chauviré, 1999Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1999). Position systématique de Nupharanassa bohemica Mlíkovsky, 1999. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Series IIA, Earth and Planetary Science, 329(2), 149-152.; Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).): short, wide and flattened distal end of the tarsometatarsus, the anterior surface lacks a well-marked extensor groove, trochleae II and IV shorter than trochlea III, trochlea II reaches farther distally than trochlea IV (trochleae III and IV are subequally extended distally in Geranopteridae; Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré, 2000Mayr, G., and Mourer-Chauviré, C. (2000). Rollers (Aves: Coraciiformes ss) from the middle Eocene of Messel (Germany) and the upper Eocene of the Quercy (France). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20(3), 533-546.; Mourer-Chauviré, 1999Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1999). Position systématique de Nupharanassa bohemica Mlíkovsky, 1999. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Series IIA, Earth and Planetary Science, 329(2), 149-152.), deep distal interosseous groove between trochleae III and IV, and enlarged distal vascular foramen.
In spite of being represented by several fossils in the past, the fossil record of Coraciidae is now restricted to the extinct genus Miocoracias and the still living genera Coracias and Eurystomus (Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).). Most other taxa previously referred as being fossil coraciids resulted as being part of other coraciiform lineages (Mayr, 2009; Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré, 2000Mayr, G., and Mourer-Chauviré, C. (2000). Rollers (Aves: Coraciiformes ss) from the middle Eocene of Messel (Germany) and the upper Eocene of the Quercy (France). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20(3), 533-546.; Mourer-Chauviré, 1999Mourer-Chauviré, C. (1999). Position systématique de Nupharanassa bohemica Mlíkovsky, 1999. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Series IIA, Earth and Planetary Science, 329(2), 149-152.; Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).). Comparisons between Chehuenia, Miocoracias, Coracias, and Eurystomus indicate that the former is a distinctive taxon. In Chehuenia the distal vascular foramen is proximally positioned and is proximodistally elongate, being similar in both aspects to the extinct genus Miocoracias, and different from the condition of living genera Coracias and Eurystomus (Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).). Its metatarsal trochlea IV is only slightly distally extended than trochlea III, in contrast to the shorter condition shown by Miocoracias and Coracias. IV metatarsal trochlea in Chehuenia is transversely narrow and subrectangular in contour, contrasting with the subquadrangular condition present in Miocoracias, Coracias, and Eurystomus. Its metatarsal IV shows a well-developed posterior wing that is more developed than in Miocoracias and Eurystomus, whereas in Coracias this wing is nearly absent. Metatarsal III trochlea of Chehuenia shows well defined and prominent rims separated by a deep groove as in Miocoracias, and contrasting with Coracias and Eurystomus. II metatarsal trochlea is thicker than in Miocoracias and Coracias, and its posteromedial wing is very well-developed, and is as posteriorly extended as in Coracias. The posterior opening of the distal vascular foramen in Chehuenia is ovoidal in contour, as in Coracias and Eurystomus, but contrasting with the more elongate condition present in Miocoracias. In distal view the trochleae form a “U” shaped opened arch, more marked than in Eurystomus and Coracias.
As remarked by the comparisons made above, the position of Chehuenia within Coraciidae is not clear. As indicated in the descriptive section, there are some differences with extant members of Coraciidae. In contrast to extant members of the clade, the trochlea metatarsi III is distally splayed (Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).). On the other side, some similarities are noted with Miocoracias from the Early Miocene of France, namely, the well developed posterior wing of metatarsal IV trochlea and arched trochleae in distal view (see Mourer-Chauviré et al., 2013Mourer-Chauviré, C., Peyrouse, J.B., and Hugueney, M. (2013). A new roller (Aves: Coraciiformes ss: Coraciidae) from the Early Miocene of the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy area, Allier, France. In Paleontological Research 2013-Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Palaeontology and Evolution (pp. 81-92).). The incomplete nature of the available specimen does not allow for refining the phylogenetic position of Chehuenia among coraciids.
The only previous fossil record of fossil coraciiforms in South America is Ueekenkcoracias tambussiae, from the Eocene of Chubut province, Patagonia (Degrange et al., 2021Degrange, F.J., Pol, D., Puerta, P., and Wilf, P. (2021). Unexpected larger distribution of paleogene stem-rollers (Aves, Coracii): new evidence from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-9.; but see Mayr, 2022Mayr, G. (2022). A partial skeleton of Septencoracias from the early Eocene London Clay reveals derived features of bee-eaters (Meropidae) in a putative stem group roller (Aves, Coracii). Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 102, 449-463.). Chehuenia differs from Ueekenkcoracias in having metatarsal trochlea IV more distally extended than trochlea II, and in that the II trochlea is not strongly medially deflected.
Passeriformes Linnaeus, 1758
⌅Tyranni Wetmore and Miller, 1926
Indeterminate genus and species
Referred material. MACN SC 3300, incomplete distal end of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 18 F-H); MACN SC 3303, incomplete distal end of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 18 D-E); MACN SC 3304, incomplete distal end of left tarsometatarsus (Figure 18 A-C); MACN SC 3305, incomplete distal end of right tarsometatarsus (Figure 18 I-K).
Locality and horizon. Loma de la Lluvia fossil site, Pinturas River, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. The specimens come from beds belonging to the Early-Middle Miocene Pinturas Formation.
Description. Based on size and shape, three different morphotypes can be recognized.
The first morphotype is represented by specimen MACN SC 3303. It is the largest available specimen (2 milimeters of maximum transverse width). In spite of being incompletely preserved, it resembles in size and shape the furnariid genus Pseudoseisura. The distal end of the bone shaft is anteroposteriorly flattened. Medial and lateral margins of the shaft are strongly distally divergent. The IV trochlea slightly surpasses distally the proximal edge of the III trochlea. It is subrectangular in contour when viewed anteriorly and shows a well-developed excavation. Both trochlea IV and III are proximally delimited by subcircular and deep extensor pits. The preserved base of the trochlea III indicates that it was notably large. Intertrochlear grooves are well developed and are proximally extended along the shaft as shallow grooves that reach the level of the distal vascular foramen. The distal vascular foramen is relatively small and slit-like, and is proximally extended by a well defined and deep outer extensor groove. Scar for metatarsal I is crescent shaped, relatively well-excavated and well-delimited, but not strongly raised from the shaft.
Specimen MACN SC 3300 shows a combination of characteristics very similar to MACN SC 3303, but is much smaller (1.5 milimeters of maximum preserved width). The trochlea III is strongly excavated and is proximally continuous with the extensor pit. In posterior view the excavation of the trochlea is delimited by nearly symmetrical sharp medial and lateral rims.
Specimens MACN SC 3304 and MACN SC 3305 represent a third morphotype (1.7 milimeters of maximum preserved width between distal trochleae in MACN SC 3304). They are very similar in several features to the previously described morphotypes, but are much smaller. They show intermetatarsal grooves, proximally extending from the intertrochlear notches, much deeper and more well-defined than in other morphotypes. The trochlea III is well-excavated and distally flared, resulting in a subtriangular contour when viewed anteriorly. It is anteriorly raised from the rest of the metatarsal shaft. The preserved part of trochlea II indicates that it was relatively small and medially inflected.
Remarks. The specimens described here are referred to passeriforms because of the combined presence of distal trochlea in the same plane when viewed distally, with III trochlea notably larger than IV and IV, wide intertrochlear grooves, and the lateral plantar ridge not prominent (Hamon, 1964Hamon, J.H. (1964). Osteology and paleontology of the passerine birds of the Reddick, Florida, Pleistocene. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin, 44, 1-210.; Mayr and Manegold, 2004Mayr, G., and Manegold, A. (2004). The oldest European fossil songbird from the early Oligocene of Germany. Naturwissenschaften, 91(4), 173-177.; see also Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228.). Furthermore, in spite of their incomplete nature, the specimens may be included among Tyranni suboscines by having the scar for metatarsal I not well-raised from the shaft, trochlea II relatively small, trochlea III slightly distally expanded, and trochlea IV somewhat laterally inflected and excavated (the later shared with Menurae; Ballmann, 1969Ballmann, P. (1969). Die Vögel aus der altburdigalen Spaltenfüllung von Wintershof (West) bei Eichstätt in Bayern. Zitteliana, 1, 5-60.; Boles, 1995aBoles, W.E. (1995a). The world’s oldest songbird. Nature, 374, 21-22. ,bBoles, W.E. (1995b). A preliminary analysis of the Passeriformes from Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland, Australia, with the description of a new species of lyrebird. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 181, 163-170.; Hamon, 1964Hamon, J.H. (1964). Osteology and paleontology of the passerine birds of the Reddick, Florida, Pleistocene. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin, 44, 1-210.; Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228.). Moreover, as in most Tyranni, the distal end of the bone proximal to the trochleae is strongly flattened (Pycraft, 1906).
Among Tyranni, the phylogenetic position of available specimens is not certain. They differ from Dendrocolaptidae because trochlea IV is much shorter and smaller than trochlea III and because the distal end of the bone does not suddenly broadens transversely (Feduccia, 1973Feduccia, A. (1973). Evolutionary trends in the Neotropical ovenbirds and woodhewers. Ornithological Monographs, (13), 1-69.; Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228.; Maurício et al., 2012). In contrast to Thamnophilidae and “Furnariidae” trochlea IV is distinctly grooved (shared with Rhinocryptidae and Formicariidae; Feduccia and Olson, 1982Feduccia, A., and Olson, S. L. (1982). Morphological similarities between the Menurae and the Rhinocryptidae, relict passerine birds of the Southern Hemisphere. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 366, 1-22.; Maurício et al., 2012). Trochlea III shows a well-defined and deep groove, as occurs in Dendrocolaptidae, Rhinocryptidae and Formicariidae, contrasting with “Furnariidae” and Tyrannidae (see Feduccia and Olson, 1982Feduccia, A., and Olson, S. L. (1982). Morphological similarities between the Menurae and the Rhinocryptidae, relict passerine birds of the Southern Hemisphere. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 366, 1-22.; Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228.; Maurício et al., 2012). In contrast to Dendrocolaptidae and “Furnariidae” trochlea II does not exceed the anterior surface of the tarsometatarsus (Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228.). In most of the above mentioned features, available specimens are similar to Formicariidae, but a taxonomic referral is far from certain. It is preferred here to leave the specimens as indeterminate Tyranni.
DISCUSSION
⌅The new fossil bird remains described above belong to different avian clades and constitute important additions to the knowledge of Miocene birds from Patagonia.
Tinamidae. The description of the new genus and species of tinamid Mininothura talenki constitutes an important addition to the palaeognath clade. Despite being represented by distal humeri, the morphology of available elements indicates a very small species with distinctive anatomical features. Mininothura, together with previously described tinamid remains from the Santa Cruz and Pinturas Formations (Bertelli and Chiappe, 2005Bertelli, S., and Chiappe, L.M. (2005). Earliest tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Miocene of Argentina and their phylogenetic position. Museum of Loas Angeles Contributions in Science, 502, 1-20.; Chiappe, 1991Chiappe, L.M. (1991). Fossil birds from the Miocene Pinturas Formation of southern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(Suppl), R21-22.), show that the tinamid radiation was far more impressive than presumed. Mininothura and other tinamids from Santa Cruz and Pinturas beds do not comfortably fit any of the extant tinamid lineages and may have formed part of a stem-tinamid radiation that does not have direct relationships to extant members of the clade.
Anseriformes. The fossil record of anseriforms in the Paleogene and early Neogene in South America, particularly Patagonia, is still very patchy. However, it is enough to demonstrate that anseriforms were very diverse and included a large number of lineages and basal members of the group (see Cenizo and Agnolín, 2010Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514.).
Peioa is a basal anseriform of uncertain affinities. It lacks derived features characterizing most anseriform clades, but shows some features in common with the coeval Eutelornis and extant anseranatids. Regardless of its affinities, it reinforces previous thoughts indicating that South America harbored a high diversity of basal anseriforms that are still very poorly known and waiting to be discovered (Cenizo and Agnolín, 2010Cenizo, M.M., and Agnolín, F.L. (2010). The southernmost records of Anhingidae and a new basal species of Anatidae (Aves) from the lower-middle Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 34(4), 493-514.).
Chainkanas koshon is a new member of the clade Anhimidae. Anhimids have a very poor fossil record. Its oldest members are Chaunoides and Loxornis from the Oligocene of Brazil and Patagonia, respectively (Alvarenga, 1999Alvarenga, H.M. (1999). A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: Anhimidae) from the Middle Tertiary of Southeastern Brazil. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 89, 223-230.). Extant members of the Anhimidae have their southernmost records in Buenos Aires province, Argentina (De La Peña, 2013De la Peña, M.R. (2013). Citas, observaciones y distribución de aves argentinas. Edición ampliada. Serie: Naturaleza, Conservación, y Sociedad Nº 7, Buenos Aires: Ediciones Biológica. 786 pp.). Chainkanas is more than 1300 kilometers away from the southernmost records of the clade, which is congruent with other faunistic evidence (e.g., monkeys, porcupines, seriemas; Tonni and Carlini, 2008Tonni, E.P. and Carlini A.A. (2008). Chapter 13: Neogene vertebrates from Argentine Patagonia: their relationship with the most significant climatic changes. In: “Late Cenozoic of Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego” J. Rabassa (Ed.). Elsevier.) indicative of a warmer and humid climate in southern Patagonia during early Miocene times.
Tadornine anatids described here include the new genera and species Kaikenia mourerchauvirea and Tamtamia yzurietai, both very different from each other in size and anatomical features. Both strongly differ from each other and also from the extant Patagonian tadornines of the genus Chloephaga. The differences between these anatids and other known members of the clade may indicate that they are not closely related to any extant tadornines and they may constitute extinct branches of the lineage.
It is worth mentioning that there are no fossil specimens belonging to the derived clade Anatini, which includes Anas and its kin (Livezey, 1991Livezey, B.C. (1991). A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (Tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. The Auk, 108(3), 471-507.). This reinforces the idea that anatines arrived in South America during Pleistocene times, as indicated elsewhere (Agnolín and Tomassini, 2012Agnolín, F.L., and Tomassini, R.L. (2012). A fossil Dendrocygninae (Aves, Anatidae) from the early Pliocene of the Argentine Pampas and its paleobiogeographical implications. Annales de Paléontologie, 98, 191-201.). In addition, no remains of dendrocygnines were found, in contrast to the Miocene beds of Chubut province (Acosta Hospitaleche et al., 2007) and early Pliocene of Buenos Aires province (Agnolín and Tomassini, 2012Agnolín, F.L., and Tomassini, R.L. (2012). A fossil Dendrocygninae (Aves, Anatidae) from the early Pliocene of the Argentine Pampas and its paleobiogeographical implications. Annales de Paléontologie, 98, 191-201.). However, it should be noted that the identification of the latter specimen is not certain. Important differences in the shape of the anterior articular ligament and strong compression of the distal end of the humerus reported by Agnolín and Tomassini (2012)Agnolín, F.L., and Tomassini, R.L. (2012). A fossil Dendrocygninae (Aves, Anatidae) from the early Pliocene of the Argentine Pampas and its paleobiogeographical implications. Annales de Paléontologie, 98, 191-201. are reminiscent of some waterbirds, such as phoenicopterids.
The finding of early Miocene basal Anseriformes, Anhimidae, and Tadorninae in Patagonia constitutes an important addition to extinct avifaunas from the Southern Cone and helps to fill important gaps in the anseriform fossil record.
Phoenicopteriformes. The fossil record of Tertiary phoenicopteriforms in South America is restricted to a few localities (Ubilla et al., 1990Ubilla, M., Perea, D., Tambussi, C., and Tonni, E.P. (1990). Primer registro fósil de Phoenicopteridae (Aves: Charadriiformes) para el Uruguay (Mio-Plioceno). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 62, 61-68.; Alvarenga, 1990Alvarenga, H.M.F. (1990). Flamingos Fósseis da Bacia de Taubaté, estado de S o Paulo, Brasil: descrição de nova espécie. Anais Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 62, 335-345.; Noriega and Agnolín, 2008Noriega, J.I., and Agnolín, F.L. (2008). El registro paleontológico de las Aves del “Mesopotamiense” (Formación Ituzaingó; Mioceno tardío-Plioceno) de la provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina. INSUGEO, Miscelánea, 17, 271-290.; Agnolín, 2009Agnolín, F.L. (2009). Una nueva especie del género Megapaloelodus (Aves: Phoenicopteridae: Palaelodinae) del Mioceno Superior del noroeste de Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, 11(1), 23-32.). Ameghino (1899)Ameghino, F. (1899). Sinopsis geologico-paleontologica... En segundo censo nacional de la República Argentina... 1898... Suplemento (adiciones y correcciones), Julio de 1899. Imp. Encuadernacion “La Libertad”, 19 pp. described the new genus and species Tiliornis senex based on a coracoid coming from Oligocene beds in Santa Cruz province. However, his description is very brief and the specimen on which he based the description is now lost. This left Tiliornis senex as a nomen dubium (see Tonni, 1980Tonni, E.P. (1980). The present state of knowledge of the Cenozoic birds of Argentina. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 330, 105-114.).
Tiliornis aside, the oldest unambiguous record for Phoenicopteriformes in South America comes from the Oligocene Tremembé Formation in Brazil, where the presence of the genera Agnopterus and Palaelodus is reported (Alvarenga, 1990Alvarenga, H.M.F. (1990). Flamingos Fósseis da Bacia de Taubaté, estado de S o Paulo, Brasil: descrição de nova espécie. Anais Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 62, 335-345.). The specimens described here constitute the second oldest records for the clade in South America, and indicate that Juncitarsus-like phoenicopteriforms were probably present in Patagonia during the early-middle Miocene. Despite the fact that Juncitarsus was traditionally included among phoenicopteriforms, recent authors have suggested that it may be the sister taxon to the clade formed by phoenicopteriforms and podicipediforms (Mayr, 2014Mayr, G. (2014). The Eocene Juncitarsus-its phylogenetic position and significance for the evolution and higher-level affinities of flamingos and grebes. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 13(1), 9-18.).
Gruiformes. Fossil gruiforms from South America include ralloids, gruids (including the fossil species “Aramus” paludigrus; see Contreras et al., 2019Contreras Roqué, J.R., Aguilar, H.A., Piloni, G., Agnolín, F., Delfino Aguayo, M.A., Giacchino, A., ... and Davies, Y.E. (2019). Historia natural del Carau: Aramus guarauna. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, 166 pp.) from the late Miocene of Argentina and Colombia (Noriega and Agnolín, 2008Noriega, J.I., and Agnolín, F.L. (2008). El registro paleontológico de las Aves del “Mesopotamiense” (Formación Ituzaingó; Mioceno tardío-Plioceno) de la provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina. INSUGEO, Miscelánea, 17, 271-290.; Contreras et al., 2019Contreras Roqué, J.R., Aguilar, H.A., Piloni, G., Agnolín, F., Delfino Aguayo, M.A., Giacchino, A., ... and Davies, Y.E. (2019). Historia natural del Carau: Aramus guarauna. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, 166 pp.), and cariamiforms of the clades Idiornithidae, Cariamidae and Phororhacoidea (Agnolín, 2009Agnolín, F.L. (2009). Una nueva especie del género Megapaloelodus (Aves: Phoenicopteridae: Palaelodinae) del Mioceno Superior del noroeste de Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, 11(1), 23-32.; Tambussi and Degrange, 2013).
Chiappe (1991)Chiappe, L.M. (1991). Fossil birds from the Miocene Pinturas Formation of southern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(Suppl), R21-22. mentioned the presence of a cariamid within the Pinturas Formation, but I was not able to find the specimen. This record may be based on the specimen that is assigned in this work to the new genus and species of gruoid Patagogrus olsoni. As indicated previously by Chiappe (1991)Chiappe, L.M. (1991). Fossil birds from the Miocene Pinturas Formation of southern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(Suppl), R21-22., phororhacoids are very scarce in the Pinturas Formation bird assemblage, being represented by incomplete remains of a possible Psilopterinae (pers. obs.).
Patagogrus constitutes the first gruid described from Patagonia. The fossil record of gruoids, and particularly gruids, is almost entirely restricted to North America and the Old World (Cracraft, 1973aCracraft, J. (1973a). Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (class Aves). 3, Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 151, 1-127.; Olson, 1985Olson, S. L. (1985). The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 79-238). In South America, the fossil record of gruids is restricted to cf. Grus sp., from the late Miocene Ituzaingó Formation in northeastern Argentina (Noriega and Agnolín, 2008Noriega, J.I., and Agnolín, F.L. (2008). El registro paleontológico de las Aves del “Mesopotamiense” (Formación Ituzaingó; Mioceno tardío-Plioceno) de la provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina. INSUGEO, Miscelánea, 17, 271-290.) and “Aramus” paludigrus from the middle Miocene of Colombia, which was originally considered to be a large species of the genus Aramus (Rasmussen, 1997Rasmussen, T. 1997. Birds. In: Kay, R.F., R.H. Madden, R.L. Cifelli and J.J. Flynn (eds.). Vertebrate paleontology in the neotropics - the Miocene fauna of La Venta, Colombia. Smithsonian Institution Press, 171-183.) and more recently as a possible member of Gruidae (Contreras et al., 2019Contreras Roqué, J.R., Aguilar, H.A., Piloni, G., Agnolín, F., Delfino Aguayo, M.A., Giacchino, A., ... and Davies, Y.E. (2019). Historia natural del Carau: Aramus guarauna. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, 166 pp.). If the identification of Patagogrus is correct, it may constitute the oldest record for the clade in South America, and one of the few records on the entire continent. It also indicates that gruids were much more geographically widespread and diverse than previously assumed.
Gruids, together with coraciiforms, form two clades having fossil records in South America, but that had become regionally extinct by post-Miocene times (see Degrange et al., 2021Degrange, F.J., Pol, D., Puerta, P., and Wilf, P. (2021). Unexpected larger distribution of paleogene stem-rollers (Aves, Coracii): new evidence from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-9.). Their geographical distribution during the Cenozoic is a pattern matched by several avian lineages that were much more widespread in the geologic past than today (see Mayr, 2011Mayr, G., Alvarenga, H., and Clarke, J.A. (2011). An Elaphrocnemus-like landbird and other avian remains from the late Paleocene of Brazil. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 56(4), 679-684.).
Parvigruids are an extinct clade of basal gruoids that has their fossil record restricted to the Oligocene of Europe (Mayr, 2005Mayr, G. (2005). A chicken-sized crane precursor from the early Oligocene of France. Naturwissenschaften, 92(8), 389-393., 2009, 2013; Mayr and Smith, 2001Mayr, G., and Smith, R. (2001). Ducks, rails, and limicoline waders (Aves: Anseriformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes) from the lowermost Oligocene of Belgium. Geobios, 34(5), 547-561.). If correctly identified, the parvigruid Alhuenia may constitute the youngest record for the clade, but more importantly, the first record of parvigruids in South America. It represents an additional example of shared avifaunas between Europe and South America and also makes evident that the history of gruiforms in the continent is far from being satisfactorily known.
The Psophiidae is a small group of gruoids that are now represented by 8 species of the genus Psophia, geographically restricted to the tropics of South America (Oppenheimer and Silveira, 2009 Oppenheimer, M., and Silveira, L.F. (2009). A taxonomic review of the Dark-winged Trumpeter Psophia viridis (Aves: Gruiformes: Psophiidae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 49, 547-555.). Archaeopsophia aoni described here shares the unique combination of characteristics exhibited on the hypotarsus diagnostic of Psophiidae. Previously, Olson (1985)Olson, S. L. (1985). The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 79-238 suggested that the early Miocene Patagonian Anisolornis excavatus was similar to psophiids, but this taxon is now regarded as an indeterminate gruiform (Tambussi and Degrange, 2013). A possible psophiid coracoid was described from the Oligocene of France (Mayr and Mourer-Chauviré, 2006Mayr, G., and Manegold, A. (2006). New specimens of the earliest European passeriform bird. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 51(2), 315-323.), which is an additional example of shared bird taxa between South America and Europe (see Agnolín, 2016Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172.). Similar to the case of Anhimidae and other fossil birds, the record of Psophiidae in Santa Cruz is located far from the distribution of extant members of the clade, by more than 3000 kilometers, supporting the claim of more humid and warmer conditions for the area during the Miocene (Tonni and Carlini, 2008Tonni, E.P. and Carlini A.A. (2008). Chapter 13: Neogene vertebrates from Argentine Patagonia: their relationship with the most significant climatic changes. In: “Late Cenozoic of Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego” J. Rabassa (Ed.). Elsevier.; Vizcaino et al., 2012Vizcaíno, S.F., Kay, R.F. , and Bargo, M.S. (Eds.). (2012). Early Miocene paleobiology in Patagonia: high-latitude paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 370 pp.).
The fossil specimens reported here from the Pinturas Formation and belonging to Rallidae, constitute the oldest record for the family in South America. The previously undisputed oldest rallids were from the Pleistocene epoch (Cenizo et al., 2015Cenizo, M.M., Agnolín, F.L. , and Pomi, L.H. (2015). A new Pleistocene bird assemblage from the southern Pampas (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 420, 65-81.; Cuello, 1988Cuello, J.P. (1988). Lista de las aves fósiles de la región neotropical y de las islas antillanas. Paula-Coutiana, 2, 3-79.). This implies that the regional paleontological record of rallids is very patchy, and indicates that the evolutionary history of the clade in the continent is nearly unknown.
Falconidae. Fossil falconids from the early Miocene of Patagonia were first noticed by Ameghino (1894Ameghino, F. (1894). Enumération synoptique des espèces de mammifères fossiles des formations éocènes de Patagonie. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias (Córdoba), 13, 259- 452., 1895Ameghino, F. (1895). Sur les oiseaux fossiles de Patagonie. Boletín del Instituto Geográfico Argentino, 15, 501- 602., 1899Ameghino, F. (1899). Sinopsis geologico-paleontologica... En segundo censo nacional de la República Argentina... 1898... Suplemento (adiciones y correcciones), Julio de 1899. Imp. Encuadernacion “La Libertad”, 19 pp.) who described the genera Badiostes and Thegornis from Santacrucian beds. Noriega et al. (2011)Noriega, J.I., Areta, J.I., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Bargo, M.S. (2011). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the patagonian Miocene falcon Thegornis musculosus Ameghino, 1895 (Aves: Falconidae). Journal of Paleontology, 85(6), 1089-1104. indicated that Thegornis belongs to the falconid subfamily Herpetotherinae. Later, Agnolín (2016)Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172. referred to herpetetheriines the genus Badiostes, as well as an incomplete skull from the late Miocene of Chubut province, Patagonia, that was previously referred to Accipitridae (Picasso et al., 2009Picasso, M.B., Tambussi, C., and Dozo, M. T. (2009). Neurocranial and brain anatomy of a Late Miocene eagle (Aves, Accipitridae) from Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29(3), 831-836.). To this list of herpetotheriines we add here the new species Thegornis spivacowi, which is much smaller than the type species of the genus Thegornis musculosus. This reinforces the idea that herpetotheriines in the past were strongly diversified and widespread throughout Patagonia (Agnolín, 2016Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172.). Furthermore, the finding of Thegornis in both Santacrucian and Pinturan beds constitutes the first bird genus shared between both stratigraphical units. It is worth mentioning that no single bird species is shared by the aforementioned formations.
Adding here to the meager list of Patagonian fossil falconids, is the new genus and species Caroohierax rapoporti. Despite being known by an incomplete distal end of a tarsometatarsus, it is enough to conclude that it does not belong to any particular falconid clade. These records, together with the finding of a basal falconid from the Eocene of Antarctica (Cenizo et al., 2013) support the view that falcons had an important chapter of their evolution on southern continents.
Strigiformes. Enskenia galeanoi constitutes the oldest record of Strigiformes from South America (as indicated by Chiappe, 1991Chiappe, L.M. (1991). Fossil birds from the Miocene Pinturas Formation of southern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(Suppl), R21-22.), and is separated by more than 10 million years from the remaining records of the clade that are restricted to the Pleistocene (LoCoco et al., 2020LoCoco, G.E.L., Agnolín, F.L. , and Carrión, J.L.R. (2020). Late Pleistocene owls (Aves, Strigiformes) from Ecuador, with the description of a new species. Journal of Ornithology, 161(3), 713-721.), indicating a very long gap in the fossil record for the entire continent.
Enskenia is known by incomplete tarsometatarsi that show plesiomorphic features when compared with recent Strigidae and Tytonidae. In several aspects it is similar to the Paleogene-early Neogene owls of the clade Sophiornithidae, geographically restricted to Europe (Mayr, 2009; Mourer-Chauviré, 1994Mourer-Chauvire, C. (1994). A large owl from the Palaeocene of France. Palaeontology, 37(2), 339-348.). If this identification is correct, the Sophiornithidae may constitute an additional Tertiary bird clade shared between South America and Europe.
Coraciidae. Coraciiforms are represented in the fossil record of South America by the stem-Coracii Ueekenkcoracias tambussiae described from Eocene beds at Chubut province, Patagonia (Degrange et al., 2021Degrange, F.J., Pol, D., Puerta, P., and Wilf, P. (2021). Unexpected larger distribution of paleogene stem-rollers (Aves, Coracii): new evidence from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-9.). Recently, Mayr (2022)Mayr, G. (2022). A partial skeleton of Septencoracias from the early Eocene London Clay reveals derived features of bee-eaters (Meropidae) in a putative stem group roller (Aves, Coracii). Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 102, 449-463. questioned the affinities of this taxon and proposed that it belongs to a form closely related to the Eocene European genus Palaeopsittacus. In any case, the finding of the derived coraciid Chehuenia facongrandei in the early Miocene beds of Santa Cruz indicates that the coraciiforms were widespread both temporally and geographically in South America. Regrettably, its fossil record is still extremely biased. If correctly identified, Chehuenia may constitute the first record for the family in the entire continent.
Although nowadays Coracii has a mainly paleotropical distribution, its fossil record includes several specimens from the Paleogene of Europe and North America (Mayr, 2009). Chehuenia (as well as Ueekenkcoracias if its coraciiform affinities are accepted), and a fossil coraciiform reported from the early Eocene of the Tingamarra fauna in Australia (Elzanowski and Boles, 2015Elzanowski, A., and Boles, W.E. (2015). A coraciiform-like bird quadrate from the Early Eocene Tingamarra local fauna of Queensland, Australia. Emu-Austral Ornithology, 115(2), 110-116.) indicate that these arboreal birds were geographically widespread in the past. Together with gruids, coraciiforms constitute a bird clade that had a wide past geograhical distribution and are nowadays restricted to the Old World.
Passeriformes. Previous fossil records of Passeriformes in South America were restricted to Pliocene and Pleistocene beds (Noriega, 1998Noriega, J.I. (1998): Aspectos paleozoogeográficos del registro de los Passeriformes (Aves) del Plioceno y Pleistoceno en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas de las Quintas Jornadas Geológicas y Geofísicas Bonaerenses, 1, 65-71.), with the exception of a distal end of humerus coming from the Pinturas Formation (Noriega and Chiappe, 1993Noriega, J.I., and Chiappe, L.M. (1993). An early Miocene passeriform from Argentina. The Auk, 936-938.) and an incomplete ulna from the Late Miocene (Cenizo et al., 2012Cenizo, M.M., Tambussi, C.P., and Montalvo, C.I. (2012). Late Miocene continental birds from the Cerro Azul Formation in the Pampean region (central-southern Argentina). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 36(1), 47-68.). Both the ulna and humerus were identified as belonging to Tyranni, a clade that is traditionally regarded as having a long history, and probably its own origin in South America (Cracraft, 1973bCracraft, J. (1973b). Continental drift, paleoclimatology, and the evolution and biogeography of birds. Journal of Zoology, 169(4), 455-543.; Feduccia, 1977Feduccia, A. (1977). A model for the evolution of perching birds. Systematic Biology, 26(1), 19-31.; Feduccia and Olson, 1982Feduccia, A., and Olson, S. L. (1982). Morphological similarities between the Menurae and the Rhinocryptidae, relict passerine birds of the Southern Hemisphere. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 366, 1-22.; Mayr, 1964Mayr, E. (1964). Inferences concerning the Tertiary American bird faunas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 51(2), 280.), as well as probably former Gondwana landmasses (e.g., Claramunt and Cracraft, 2015Claramunt, S., and Cracraft, J. (2015). A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds. Science Advances, 1(11), e1501005.; Cracraft, 2001Cracraft, J. (2001). Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1466), 459-469.; Edwards and Boles, 2002Edwards, S.V., and Boles, W.E. (2002). Out of Gondwana: the origin of passerine birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17(8), 347-349.). However, recent findings of fossil Tyranni in Oligocene beds from Europe (e.g., Bochénski et al., 2011, 2018, 2021; Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228., 2009Manegold, A. (2009). The early fossil record of perching birds (Passeriformes). Palaeontologia Africana, 44, 103-107.; Mayr, 2013bMayr, G. (2013b). The age of the crown group of passerine birds and its evolutionary significance-molecular calibrations versus the fossil record. Systematics and Biodiversity, 11(1), 7-13.), indicate that the history of the clade is far more complex than perviously thought.
The fossils described here constitute the oldest member of passeriforms known in South America (Noriega and Chiappe, 1993Noriega, J.I., and Chiappe, L.M. (1993). An early Miocene passeriform from Argentina. The Auk, 936-938.). These indicate that a relatively high diversity of Tyranni was represented by early Miocene times in South America (at least three different morphotypes of tarsometatarsus in coeval beds were reported). Similarly, records from Oligocene-early Miocene in Australia (as reported earlier by Boles, 1995bBoles, W.E. (1995b). A preliminary analysis of the Passeriformes from Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland, Australia, with the description of a new species of lyrebird. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 181, 163-170.), and Europe (having both members of Oscines and Tyranni; Manegold, 2008Manegold, A. (2008). Earliest fossil record of the Certhioidea (treecreepers and allies) from the early Miocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology, 149(2), 223-228., 2009Manegold, A. (2009). The early fossil record of perching birds (Passeriformes). Palaeontologia Africana, 44, 103-107.; Mayr, 2001 3bMayr, G., and Smith, R. (2001). Ducks, rails, and limicoline waders (Aves: Anseriformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes) from the lowermost Oligocene of Belgium. Geobios, 34(5), 547-561.; Mayr and Manegold, 2004Mayr, G., and Manegold, A. (2004). The oldest European fossil songbird from the early Oligocene of Germany. Naturwissenschaften, 91(4), 173-177., 2006Mayr, G., and Manegold, A. (2006). New specimens of the earliest European passeriform bird. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 51(2), 315-323.), together with the fact that Early Eocene passeriforms are known from Australia (Boles, 1997Boles, W.E. (1997). Fossil songbirds (Passeriformes) from the early Eocene of Australia. Emu, 97, 43-50.), suggest that the clade has a much deeper history than reflected by the meager fossil record (Ericson et al., 2002Ericson, P.G., Christidis, L., Cooper, A., Irestedt, M., Jackson, J., Johansson, U.S., and Norman, J.A. (2002). A Gondwanan origin of passerine birds supported by DNA sequences of the endemic New Zealand wrens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1488), 235-241.), and that we are nearly unaware of its history in South America.
Members of Formicariidae are frequent in Pliocene beds from Buenos Aires province (Noriega, 1998Noriega, J.I. (1998): Aspectos paleozoogeográficos del registro de los Passeriformes (Aves) del Plioceno y Pleistoceno en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas de las Quintas Jornadas Geológicas y Geofísicas Bonaerenses, 1, 65-71.). The tarsometatarsi described here share a combination of characteristics present in Formicariidae; if this tentative identification is correct, it may be indicative that members of that clade had a wide distribution and diversification throughout the Neogene in the Southern Cone.
In addition, the lack of bone remains having Oscine features in Miocene beds from Santa Cruz (Noriega and Chiappe, 1993Noriega, J.I., and Chiappe, L.M. (1993). An early Miocene passeriform from Argentina. The Auk, 936-938.; present contribution) and early Pliocene outcrops from the Argentine Pampas (Noriega, 1998Noriega, J.I. (1998): Aspectos paleozoogeográficos del registro de los Passeriformes (Aves) del Plioceno y Pleistoceno en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas de las Quintas Jornadas Geológicas y Geofísicas Bonaerenses, 1, 65-71.) reinforces previous hypothesis sustaining the arrival of Oscines in South America during the GABI, during Pleistocene times (Feduccia, 1975; Noriega, 1998Noriega, J.I. (1998): Aspectos paleozoogeográficos del registro de los Passeriformes (Aves) del Plioceno y Pleistoceno en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas de las Quintas Jornadas Geológicas y Geofísicas Bonaerenses, 1, 65-71.).
The newly described birds from Santacrucian and Pinturan beds include 12 new taxa belonging to disparate clades. Some of them lack previous records in South America (e.g., Psophiidae, Coraciidae, Parvigruidae, possibly Sophiornithidae), and some are the oldest (e.g., Gruidae, Strigiformes) or the youngest (e.g., Coraciiformes) occurrences of their respective lineages on the continent. This evidences that the knowledge of fossil birds in South America is far from satisfactory.
Adding here to the long list of shared avian taxa between Europe and South America during the Paleogene and Neogene are the Psophiidae, Parvigruidae, Gruidae, and Coraciidae. This reinforces previous biogeographical models that link Cenozoic European and South American avifaunas (Agnolín, 2016Agnolín, F.L. (2016). A brief history of South American birds. Contribuciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernaridino Rivadavia”, 6, 157-172.; Ezcurra and Agnolín, 2012Ezcurra, M.D., and Agnolín, F.L. (2012). A new global palaeobiogeographical model for the late Mesozoic and early Tertiary. Systematic Biology, 61(4), 553-566.).
The early Miocene birds described here do not belong to any extant genera, which, as noted by Tambussi et al. (1993Tambussi, C.P., Noriega, J.I., and Tonni, E.P. (1993). Late Cenozoic birds of Buenos Aires Province (Argentina): an attempt to document quantitative faunal changes. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 101(1-2), 117-129.; see also Tambussi, 2011Tambussi, C.P. (2011). Palaeoenvironmental and faunal inferences based on the avian fossil record of Patagonia and Pampa: what works and what does not. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 103(2), 458-474.), had their origins in post-early Miocene times. In this regard, the Late Miocene terrestrial avifaunas from Argentina, such as those of Paraná (Diederle and Noriega, 2013Diederle, J.M., and Noriega, J.I. (2013). Aves del Mioceno de la provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Publicación Especial, Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 14, 97-108.; Noriega, 1995Noriega, J.I. (1995). The avifauna from the 'Mesopotamian' (Ituzaing6 Formation; Upper Miocene) of Entre Rios Province, Argentina. Courier Forchungsinstitut Senckenberg, 181, 141-148.; Noriega and Agnolín, 2008Noriega, J.I., and Agnolín, F.L. (2008). El registro paleontológico de las Aves del “Mesopotamiense” (Formación Ituzaingó; Mioceno tardío-Plioceno) de la provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina. INSUGEO, Miscelánea, 17, 271-290.) and Cerro Azul (Cenizo et al., 2012Cenizo, M.M., Tambussi, C.P., and Montalvo, C.I. (2012). Late Miocene continental birds from the Cerro Azul Formation in the Pampean region (central-southern Argentina). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 36(1), 47-68.), lack some archaic lineages, such as coraciiforms, Peioa, and basal anseriforms (e.g., basal tadornines), and the bird composition is “modern” in aspect, or at least in some of its characteristics (Cenizo et al., 2012Cenizo, M.M., Tambussi, C.P., and Montalvo, C.I. (2012). Late Miocene continental birds from the Cerro Azul Formation in the Pampean region (central-southern Argentina). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 36(1), 47-68.); this contrasts with the bird assemblages described here. Such avifaunal differences may be the result not only of age differences, but also of important and high-scale landscape modifications that occurred during late Miocene times.